California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 121 — Counties: disposition of real property.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 224, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors of a county to sell or lease any real property belonging to the county, as specified, provided that the board complies with certain procedural requirements. Existing law authorizes the board to enter into a lease, concession, or managerial contract involving county owned, leased, or managed property for specified purposes, without otherwise complying with the existing procedural requirements. This bill would additionally authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to sell or enter into a lease, concession, or managerial contract involving a specified area of county property that the county has acquired from the federal government due to the closure of Mather Air Force Base or McClellan Air Force Base, without complying with the existing procedural requirements referenced above, in accordance with conditions prescribed in the bill. The bill, in a similar manner, would additionally authorize the County of Merced, by a 45 vote of the board of supervisors, to sell a specified area of county property that the county has acquired from the federal government due to the closure of Castle Air Force Base. The bill would prohibit the provisions for each county from being construed to release the county from complying with specified postcompliance provisions relating to redevelopment successor agencies, if the relevant property is located in a former redevelopment area. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for those counties relative to the disposition by each county of the above-described properties.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 224, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 16. Page 2645.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1858.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 15).

  13. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 18. Page 1038.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 10).

  19. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  21. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cooley · Cosponsor
  • Dickinson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Dickinson

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Cooley

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 121 DICKINSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 60 Yea · 16 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 551402
Democratic 4000
Republican 1200
Total 601602
% of votes cast 77%21%0%3%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Holden — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Logue — Yea
Daly — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Allen — Nay
Gorell — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Maienschein — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB121 Dickinson By Huff

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Huff — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Yee — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Knight — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wolk — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 121 DICKINSON Assembly Third Reading

Passed 58 Yea · 18 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 511403
Democratic 6100
Republican 1300
Total 581803
% of votes cast 73%23%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Medina — Yea
Stone — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Daly — Yea
Torres — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Campos — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7200
Total 7200
% of votes cast 78%22%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 121 do?
Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors of a county to sell or lease any real property belonging to the county, as specified, provided that the board complies with certain procedural requirements. Existing law authorizes the board to enter into a lease, concession, or managerial contract involving county owned, leased, or managed property for specified purposes, without otherwise complying with the existing procedural requirements. This bill would additionally authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to sell or enter into a lease, concession, or managerial contract involving a specified area of county property that the county has acquired from the federal government due to the closure of Mather Air Force Base or McClellan Air Force Base, without complying with the existing procedural requirements referenced above, in accordance with conditions prescribed in the bill. The bill, in a similar manner, would additionally authorize the County of Merced, by a 45 vote of the board of supervisors, to sell a specified area of county property that the county has acquired from the federal government due to the closure of Castle Air Force Base. The bill would prohibit the provisions for each county from being construed to release the county from complying with specified postcompliance provisions relating to redevelopment successor agencies, if the relevant property is located in a former redevelopment area. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for those counties relative to the disposition by each county of the above-described properties.
Who sponsors AB 121?
AB 121 is sponsored by Cooley and Dickinson.
What is the current status of AB 121?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 121?
Track AB 121 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 121

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 121

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →