AB 848 — Adoption.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 743, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law prescribes the procedures for the relinquishment of a child to the State Department of Social Services or a licensed adoption agency for adoption, and requires the relinquishment to be signed and acknowledged before specified persons. Existing law specifies certain time periods during which a birth parent may revoke a relinquishment for adoption, but also provides that a birth parent may elect to sign a waiver of the right to revoke relinquishment in the presence of specified persons. Existing law requires that if the waiver is signed in the presence of an authorized representative of a private licensed adoption agency, the relinquishment becomes final and irrevocable at the close of the next business day. This bill would additionally provide that if the waiver is signed in the presence of an authorized representative of a private licensed adoption agency, the relinquishment becomes final and irrevocable at either the close of the next business day or at the close of the next business day after expiration of any holding period specified in writing, whichever is later. The bill would also provide that the waiver of the right to revoke relinquishment is invalid if the relinquishment is determined to be invalid, is revoked during any holding period specified in writing, or is rescinded, as specified. Under existing law, at the discretion of the department, county adoption agency, or a licensed adoption agency, an abbreviated assessment or home study of the prospective adoptive parent may be performed, as provided, if the prospective adoptive parent of a child is a foster parent with whom the child has lived for a minimum of 6 months or a relative caregiver who has had an ongoing and significant relationship with the child. This bill would permit an abbreviated assessment or home study for a licensed or certified foster parent with whom the child has lived for a minimum of 6 months, an approved relative caregiver or nonrelated extended family member with whom the dependent child has had an ongoing and significant relationship, a court-appointed relative guardian of the child, as specified, or a prospective adoptive parent who has completed an agency-supervised adoption within the last 2 years. The bill would require that the abbreviated assessment include a review by the department, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency of all previous guardianship investigation reports, home study assessments, and preplacement evaluations of each applicant, and would authorize the department or these adoption agencies to receive a copy of any of these reports upon a written request that is accompanied by a signed release from the applicant. The bill would state that these provisions do not apply to independent adoptions, and would authorize the department to promulgate regulations. Existing law requires prospective adoptive parents in an independent adoption to pay a fee to the department or delegated county adoption agency for the cost of investigating the adoption petition. Under existing law, the department or delegated adoption agency may reduce the fee to no less than $500 if the prospective adoptive parents are very low income according to the income limits published by the Department of Housing and Community Development. This bill would instead authorize the department or delegated adoption agency to reduce the fee if the prospective adoptive parents are lower income according to those income limits.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/13 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2013
- Enrolled 09/12/13 - Enrolled pdf September 12, 2013
- Amended 07/02/13 - Amended Senate pdf July 02, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- AB848 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 743, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2912.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2098.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 12).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 4).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 801.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 2).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Joe Patterson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Patterson, Joe Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 848 do?
- Existing law prescribes the procedures for the relinquishment of a child to the State Department of Social Services or a licensed adoption agency for adoption, and requires the relinquishment to be signed and acknowledged before specified persons. Existing law specifies certain time periods during which a birth parent may revoke a relinquishment for adoption, but also provides that a birth parent may elect to sign a waiver of the right to revoke relinquishment in the presence of specified persons. Existing law requires that if the waiver is signed in the presence of an authorized representative of a private licensed adoption agency, the relinquishment becomes final and irrevocable at the close of the next business day. This bill would additionally provide that if the waiver is signed in the presence of an authorized representative of a private licensed adoption agency, the relinquishment becomes final and irrevocable at either the close of the next business day or at the close of the next business day after expiration of any holding period specified in writing, whichever is later. The bill would also provide that the waiver of the right to revoke relinquishment is invalid if the relinquishment is determined to be invalid, is revoked during any holding period specified in writing, or is rescinded, as specified. Under existing law, at the discretion of the department, county adoption agency, or a licensed adoption agency, an abbreviated assessment or home study of the prospective adoptive parent may be performed, as provided, if the prospective adoptive parent of a child is a foster parent with whom the child has lived for a minimum of 6 months or a relative caregiver who has had an ongoing and significant relationship with the child. This bill would permit an abbreviated assessment or home study for a licensed or certified foster parent with whom the child has lived for a minimum of 6 months, an approved relative caregiver or nonrelated extended family member with whom the dependent child has had an ongoing and significant relationship, a court-appointed relative guardian of the child, as specified, or a prospective adoptive parent who has completed an agency-supervised adoption within the last 2 years. The bill would require that the abbreviated assessment include a review by the department, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency of all previous guardianship investigation reports, home study assessments, and preplacement evaluations of each applicant, and would authorize the department or these adoption agencies to receive a copy of any of these reports upon a written request that is accompanied by a signed release from the applicant. The bill would state that these provisions do not apply to independent adoptions, and would authorize the department to promulgate regulations. Existing law requires prospective adoptive parents in an independent adoption to pay a fee to the department or delegated county adoption agency for the cost of investigating the adoption petition. Under existing law, the department or delegated adoption agency may reduce the fee to no less than $500 if the prospective adoptive parents are very low income according to the income limits published by the Department of Housing and Community Development. This bill would instead authorize the department or delegated adoption agency to reduce the fee if the prospective adoptive parents are lower income according to those income limits.
- Who sponsors AB 848?
- AB 848 is sponsored by Patterson, Joe (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 848?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 848?
- Track AB 848 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 848
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 848
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →