California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2585 — School finance: annual budgets.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a county board of education to hold a public hearing on the proposed county school service fund budget for that fiscal year, requires the county board of education to adopt an annual budget for the budget year, and requires the county board of education to file the budget with the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law requires the Superintendent to examine the budget, as specified, and, on or before August 15, approve or disapprove the budget. If the budget is disapproved, existing law requires the Superintendent, on or before August 15, to transmit to the county office of education, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the county board of education to revise the county office of education budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the Superintendent, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the Superintendent, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law authorizes the county office of education to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the Superintendent with written notice, as specified. This bill, if the budget of a county office of education is disapproved, would instead require the county superintendent of schools and the county board of education, on or before September 8, to review the recommendations of the Superintendent at a regularly scheduled meeting of the county board of education and to respond to those recommendations. The bill would require that response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of those recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of a county office of education to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring a county superintendent of schools to undertake additional responsibilities related to reviewing the recommendations of the Superintendent, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a school district to hold a public hearing on, and adopt, a budget for the subsequent fiscal year. Existing law requires the governing board of the school district to file the adopted budget with the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to examine the adopted budget, as specified, to make certain determinations related to the adopted budget, and, on or before August 15, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the adopted budget for each school district. If the adopted budget is conditionally approved or disapproved, existing law requires the county superintendent of schools, on or before August 15, to transmit to the governing board of the school district, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the governing board of the school district to revise the adopted budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the county superintendent of schools. Existing law, if the adopted budget is disapproved, also requires the governing board of the school district and the county superintendent of schools to review the disapproval and the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools regarding revision of the budget at the public hearing. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the county superintendent of schools with written notice, as specified. This bill would require the public hearing to be conducted in accordance with a specified provision related to proposed budgets. The bill, if the adopted budget of a school district is conditionally approved or disapproved as described above, would instead require the governing board of the school district, on or before September 8, and in conjunction with the county superintendent of schools, to review and respond to the superintendent's recommendations at a regular meeting of the governing board of the school district. The bill would require the response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of the superintendent's recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of the governing board of a school district to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring school districts to undertake additional responsibilities related to the conditional approval of budgets, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 6248.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6239.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4611.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From consent calendar.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  13. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  16. Referred to Com. on ED.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4851.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  20. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 30).

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on ED.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  27. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Daly · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Daly

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 75 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70002
Democratic 3100
Republican 2001
Total 75103
% of votes cast 95%1%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Conway — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Hall — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democratic 2001
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 66006
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 73006
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Holden — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Salas — Yea
Campos — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Campos — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2585 do?
(1) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a county board of education to hold a public hearing on the proposed county school service fund budget for that fiscal year, requires the county board of education to adopt an annual budget for the budget year, and requires the county board of education to file the budget with the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law requires the Superintendent to examine the budget, as specified, and, on or before August 15, approve or disapprove the budget. If the budget is disapproved, existing law requires the Superintendent, on or before August 15, to transmit to the county office of education, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the county board of education to revise the county office of education budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the Superintendent, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the Superintendent, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law authorizes the county office of education to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the Superintendent with written notice, as specified. This bill, if the budget of a county office of education is disapproved, would instead require the county superintendent of schools and the county board of education, on or before September 8, to review the recommendations of the Superintendent at a regularly scheduled meeting of the county board of education and to respond to those recommendations. The bill would require that response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of those recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of a county office of education to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring a county superintendent of schools to undertake additional responsibilities related to reviewing the recommendations of the Superintendent, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a school district to hold a public hearing on, and adopt, a budget for the subsequent fiscal year. Existing law requires the governing board of the school district to file the adopted budget with the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to examine the adopted budget, as specified, to make certain determinations related to the adopted budget, and, on or before August 15, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the adopted budget for each school district. If the adopted budget is conditionally approved or disapproved, existing law requires the county superintendent of schools, on or before August 15, to transmit to the governing board of the school district, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the governing board of the school district to revise the adopted budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the county superintendent of schools. Existing law, if the adopted budget is disapproved, also requires the governing board of the school district and the county superintendent of schools to review the disapproval and the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools regarding revision of the budget at the public hearing. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the county superintendent of schools with written notice, as specified. This bill would require the public hearing to be conducted in accordance with a specified provision related to proposed budgets. The bill, if the adopted budget of a school district is conditionally approved or disapproved as described above, would instead require the governing board of the school district, on or before September 8, and in conjunction with the county superintendent of schools, to review and respond to the superintendent's recommendations at a regular meeting of the governing board of the school district. The bill would require the response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of the superintendent's recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of the governing board of a school district to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring school districts to undertake additional responsibilities related to the conditional approval of budgets, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 2585?
AB 2585 is sponsored by Daly.
What is the current status of AB 2585?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2585?
Track AB 2585 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2585

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2585

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →