AB 2585 — School finance: annual budgets.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a county board of education to hold a public hearing on the proposed county school service fund budget for that fiscal year, requires the county board of education to adopt an annual budget for the budget year, and requires the county board of education to file the budget with the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law requires the Superintendent to examine the budget, as specified, and, on or before August 15, approve or disapprove the budget. If the budget is disapproved, existing law requires the Superintendent, on or before August 15, to transmit to the county office of education, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the county board of education to revise the county office of education budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the Superintendent, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the Superintendent, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law authorizes the county office of education to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the Superintendent with written notice, as specified. This bill, if the budget of a county office of education is disapproved, would instead require the county superintendent of schools and the county board of education, on or before September 8, to review the recommendations of the Superintendent at a regularly scheduled meeting of the county board of education and to respond to those recommendations. The bill would require that response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of those recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of a county office of education to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring a county superintendent of schools to undertake additional responsibilities related to reviewing the recommendations of the Superintendent, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a school district to hold a public hearing on, and adopt, a budget for the subsequent fiscal year. Existing law requires the governing board of the school district to file the adopted budget with the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to examine the adopted budget, as specified, to make certain determinations related to the adopted budget, and, on or before August 15, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the adopted budget for each school district. If the adopted budget is conditionally approved or disapproved, existing law requires the county superintendent of schools, on or before August 15, to transmit to the governing board of the school district, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the governing board of the school district to revise the adopted budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the county superintendent of schools. Existing law, if the adopted budget is disapproved, also requires the governing board of the school district and the county superintendent of schools to review the disapproval and the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools regarding revision of the budget at the public hearing. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the county superintendent of schools with written notice, as specified. This bill would require the public hearing to be conducted in accordance with a specified provision related to proposed budgets. The bill, if the adopted budget of a school district is conditionally approved or disapproved as described above, would instead require the governing board of the school district, on or before September 8, and in conjunction with the county superintendent of schools, to review and respond to the superintendent's recommendations at a regular meeting of the governing board of the school district. The bill would require the response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of the superintendent's recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of the governing board of a school district to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring school districts to undertake additional responsibilities related to the conditional approval of budgets, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/09/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 09, 2014
- Enrolled 08/22/14 - Enrolled pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 08/13/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 13, 2014
- Amended 03/25/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 25, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2585 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 309, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 6248.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6239.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4611.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4851.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Daly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Daly
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 75 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 1% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2585 do?
- (1) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a county board of education to hold a public hearing on the proposed county school service fund budget for that fiscal year, requires the county board of education to adopt an annual budget for the budget year, and requires the county board of education to file the budget with the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law requires the Superintendent to examine the budget, as specified, and, on or before August 15, approve or disapprove the budget. If the budget is disapproved, existing law requires the Superintendent, on or before August 15, to transmit to the county office of education, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the county board of education to revise the county office of education budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the Superintendent, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the Superintendent, the county board of supervisors, and the county auditor. Existing law authorizes the county office of education to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the Superintendent with written notice, as specified. This bill, if the budget of a county office of education is disapproved, would instead require the county superintendent of schools and the county board of education, on or before September 8, to review the recommendations of the Superintendent at a regularly scheduled meeting of the county board of education and to respond to those recommendations. The bill would require that response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of those recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of a county office of education to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring a county superintendent of schools to undertake additional responsibilities related to reviewing the recommendations of the Superintendent, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, on or before July 1 of each year, requires a school district to hold a public hearing on, and adopt, a budget for the subsequent fiscal year. Existing law requires the governing board of the school district to file the adopted budget with the county superintendent of schools, as specified. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to examine the adopted budget, as specified, to make certain determinations related to the adopted budget, and, on or before August 15, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the adopted budget for each school district. If the adopted budget is conditionally approved or disapproved, existing law requires the county superintendent of schools, on or before August 15, to transmit to the governing board of the school district, in writing, his or her recommendations regarding revision of the budget and the reasons for those recommendations. Existing law, on or before September 8, and after a public hearing regarding the proposed revisions to the budget, as specified, requires the governing board of the school district to revise the adopted budget to reflect certain fiscal changes, to include any response to the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools, to adopt the revised budget, and to file the revised budget with the county superintendent of schools. Existing law, if the adopted budget is disapproved, also requires the governing board of the school district and the county superintendent of schools to review the disapproval and the recommendations of the county superintendent of schools regarding revision of the budget at the public hearing. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to elect to use an alternative budget review process by providing the county superintendent of schools with written notice, as specified. This bill would require the public hearing to be conducted in accordance with a specified provision related to proposed budgets. The bill, if the adopted budget of a school district is conditionally approved or disapproved as described above, would instead require the governing board of the school district, on or before September 8, and in conjunction with the county superintendent of schools, to review and respond to the superintendent's recommendations at a regular meeting of the governing board of the school district. The bill would require the response to include any revisions to the adopted budget and other proposed actions to be taken, if any, as a result of the superintendent's recommendations. The bill would repeal the authority of the governing board of a school district to elect to use the alternative budget review process. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. By requiring school districts to undertake additional responsibilities related to the conditional approval of budgets, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 2585?
- AB 2585 is sponsored by Daly.
- What is the current status of AB 2585?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2585?
- Track AB 2585 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2585
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2585
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →