District-based municipal elections.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1383 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1383.
You're tracking AB 1383
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1383 — District-based municipal elections.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for political subdivisions that encompass areas of representation within the state. With respect to these areas, public officials are generally elected by all of the voters of the political subdivision (at-large) or from districts formed within the political subdivision (district-based) . Existing law, the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, prohibits an at-large method of election to be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class, as defined. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city to submit to voters at any municipal or special election an ordinance providing for the election of members of the legislative body by districts, from districts, by districts with an elective mayor, or from districts with an elective mayor. Under existing law, "by district" means election of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone and "from district" means election of members of the legislative body who are residents of the district from which they are elected by the voters of the entire city. Existing law prescribes the procedures for the electors to change from the election of these members by district to election from districts or vice versa. This bill would permit the legislative body of a city to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district if the voters of the city previously rejected such an ordinance, as specified. This provision would be repealed on December 31, 2016. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2017, require the legislative body of a city with a population of 100,000 or more, as determined by the most recent federal decennial census, to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2017, permit the legislative body of any other city to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district. The bill would require that the boundary lines of each district be adjusted in accordance with specified provisions of law. By requiring cities to conduct elections for members of their legislative bodies in a specified manner, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 28, 2014
- Amended 09/09/13 - Amended Senate pdf September 09, 2013
- Amended 09/06/13 - Amended Senate pdf September 06, 2013
- Introduced 03/04/13 - Introduced pdf March 04, 2013
- AB1383 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 26. Noes 7. Page 2266.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Monning.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 26).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 20. Page 1471.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 8).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee April 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Roger Hernández · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 16 | 0 | 9 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 20 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 25% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Nay |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1383 do?
- Existing law provides for political subdivisions that encompass areas of representation within the state. With respect to these areas, public officials are generally elected by all of the voters of the political subdivision (at-large) or from districts formed within the political subdivision (district-based) . Existing law, the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, prohibits an at-large method of election to be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class, as defined. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city to submit to voters at any municipal or special election an ordinance providing for the election of members of the legislative body by districts, from districts, by districts with an elective mayor, or from districts with an elective mayor. Under existing law, "by district" means election of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone and "from district" means election of members of the legislative body who are residents of the district from which they are elected by the voters of the entire city. Existing law prescribes the procedures for the electors to change from the election of these members by district to election from districts or vice versa. This bill would permit the legislative body of a city to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district if the voters of the city previously rejected such an ordinance, as specified. This provision would be repealed on December 31, 2016. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2017, require the legislative body of a city with a population of 100,000 or more, as determined by the most recent federal decennial census, to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2017, permit the legislative body of any other city to provide by ordinance, without submitting the ordinance to the voters of the city for approval, for the election of members of the legislative body by district. The bill would require that the boundary lines of each district be adjusted in accordance with specified provisions of law. By requiring cities to conduct elections for members of their legislative bodies in a specified manner, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1383?
- AB 1383 is sponsored by Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 1383?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1383?
- Track AB 1383 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1383
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1383
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →