Long-term health care facilities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1816 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1816.
You're tracking AB 1816
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1816 — Long-term health care facilities.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation by the State Department of Public Health of health care facilities, including long-term health care facilities, as defined. Existing law establishes procedures to be followed when the department receives a written or oral complaint about a long-term health care facility. A complaint is defined to mean any notice to the department, other than a report from the facility, of an alleged violation of applicable requirements of state or federal law or any alleged facts that might constitute a violation. This bill, on or before July 1, 2015, would require the department to set a performance benchmark for completing its investigations within a defined number of days after receiving the complaint, not to exceed 60 working days. The bill would require the department, if it extends an investigation beyond the number of days specified in the benchmark, to notify the complainant, in writing, of the basis for the extension. The bill would require, effective July 1, 2015, and upon request of the complainant, that the department provide specific findings concerning an alleged violation, and include a summary of the evidence upon which the determination is based. The bill would require the department to comply with those specified time periods established for investigations and inspections of complaints from a facility of an alleged violation of applicable requirements of state or federal law or any alleged facts that may constitute an alleged violation of these requirements. The bill would require the department to analyze its compliance with the benchmark in its annual system and staffing analysis, to make that analysis available to the relevant fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature, and to post it on the department's Internet Web site. (2) Existing law provides the complainant with 5 business days after receipt of the notice of the department's determination in which to request an informal conference. This bill would, instead, provide the complainant with 15 days after receipt of the notice in which to request an informal conference.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/17/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 17, 2014
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 23, 2014
- Amended 04/07/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 07, 2014
- Introduced 02/18/14 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2014
- AB1816 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5347.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 1).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Yamada · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Yamada
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1816 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation by the State Department of Public Health of health care facilities, including long-term health care facilities, as defined. Existing law establishes procedures to be followed when the department receives a written or oral complaint about a long-term health care facility. A complaint is defined to mean any notice to the department, other than a report from the facility, of an alleged violation of applicable requirements of state or federal law or any alleged facts that might constitute a violation. This bill, on or before July 1, 2015, would require the department to set a performance benchmark for completing its investigations within a defined number of days after receiving the complaint, not to exceed 60 working days. The bill would require the department, if it extends an investigation beyond the number of days specified in the benchmark, to notify the complainant, in writing, of the basis for the extension. The bill would require, effective July 1, 2015, and upon request of the complainant, that the department provide specific findings concerning an alleged violation, and include a summary of the evidence upon which the determination is based. The bill would require the department to comply with those specified time periods established for investigations and inspections of complaints from a facility of an alleged violation of applicable requirements of state or federal law or any alleged facts that may constitute an alleged violation of these requirements. The bill would require the department to analyze its compliance with the benchmark in its annual system and staffing analysis, to make that analysis available to the relevant fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature, and to post it on the department's Internet Web site. (2) Existing law provides the complainant with 5 business days after receipt of the notice of the department's determination in which to request an informal conference. This bill would, instead, provide the complainant with 15 days after receipt of the notice in which to request an informal conference.
- Who sponsors AB 1816?
- AB 1816 is sponsored by Yamada.
- What is the current status of AB 1816?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1816?
- Track AB 1816 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1816
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1816
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →