California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 930 — Arson.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 481, Statutes of 2014.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law defines the crime of aggravated arson, and makes a person guilty of that crime if the person has been previously convicted of arson on one or more occasions within the past 10 years, or if the fire caused damage to, or the destruction of 5 or more inhabited structures. Existing law, until January 1, 2014, made a person guilty of aggravated arson if the fire caused property damage and other losses in excess of $6,500,000, and specified the costs to be included in calculating property damages for purposes of that provision. This bill would reenact that provision until January 1, 2019, and would increase the requisite amount of property damage and other losses to $7,000,000. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 481, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6161.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 14).

  8. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3643.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3705.) (May 23).

  15. Set for hearing May 23.

  16. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. Set for hearing April 28.

  18. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2978.) (March 25).

  20. Set for hearing March 25.

  21. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  22. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 6.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 930 Berryhill, T. Third Reading Urgency By BIGELOW

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70002
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Gray — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Not Voting
Bigelow — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading (Urgency Clause)

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Democratic 2001
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Correa — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Steinberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 930 do?
Existing law defines the crime of aggravated arson, and makes a person guilty of that crime if the person has been previously convicted of arson on one or more occasions within the past 10 years, or if the fire caused damage to, or the destruction of 5 or more inhabited structures. Existing law, until January 1, 2014, made a person guilty of aggravated arson if the fire caused property damage and other losses in excess of $6,500,000, and specified the costs to be included in calculating property damages for purposes of that provision. This bill would reenact that provision until January 1, 2019, and would increase the requisite amount of property damage and other losses to $7,000,000. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 930?
SB 930 is sponsored by Anderson, Bigelow, Nielsen, Beth Gaines, and Bill Berryhill.
What is the current status of SB 930?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 03, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 930?
Track SB 930 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 930

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 930

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →