AB 2499 — Offenders: home detention programs.

Summary

Existing law, subject to exceptions, generally makes persons convicted of a felony subject to incarceration in a county jail. Existing law requires, unless the court finds it is not in the interest of justice, that a period of the concluding portion of a county jail term be served on mandatory supervision, which is a period of suspended execution of the term supervised by county probation. Existing law provides that mandatory supervision commences upon release from custody. This bill would instead provide that unless otherwise ordered by the court, mandatory supervision would commence upon release from physical custody or an alternative custody program, whichever is later. Existing law provides that the board of supervisors of any county may authorize the correctional administrator to offer a program under which inmates committed to a county jail or other county correctional facility or granted probation, or inmates participating in a work furlough program, may voluntarily participate or involuntarily be placed in a home detention program during their sentence in lieu of confinement in the county jail or other county correctional facility or program. Existing law requires the correctional administrator to provide specified information about a participant upon request of the police department of a city where an office is located to which persons on an electronic monitoring program report. Existing law requires any information received by a police department pursuant to that request to be used only for the purpose of monitoring the impact of home electronic monitoring programs in the community. This bill would add to the information subject to those requests, at the discretion of the corrections administrator and solely for investigatory purposes, current and historic GPS location data, if available. The bill would recast the provisions restricting the use of that information to prohibit a law enforcement department that does not have the primary responsibility to supervise participants in the electronic monitoring program that receives the requested information from using the information to conduct enforcement actions based on administrative violations of the home detention program. The bill would require a law enforcement department that has knowledge that the subject in a criminal investigation is a participant in an electronic monitoring program to make reasonable efforts to notify the supervising agency prior to serving a warrant or taking any law enforcement action against a participant in an electronic monitoring program. By imposing additional requirements on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that the county board of supervisors may authorize the correctional administrator to offer a program under which inmates being held in lieu of bail in a county jail or other county correctional facility may participate in an electronic monitoring program if certain conditions are met. Existing law requires the correctional administrator to provide specified information about a participant upon request of a local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the location where a participant in an electronic monitoring program is placed. Existing law requires any information received by a law enforcement agency pursuant to that request to be used only for the purpose of monitoring the impact of home electronic monitoring programs in the community. This bill would add to the information subject to those requests, at the discretion of the corrections administrator and solely for investigatory purposes, current and historic GPS location data, if available. The bill would recast the provisions restricting the use of that information to prohibit a law enforcement agency that does not have the primary responsibility to supervise participants in the electronic monitoring program that receives the requested information from using the information to conduct enforcement actions based on administrative violations of the home detention program. The bill would require that an agency that has knowledge that the subject in a criminal investigation is a participant in an electronic monitoring program to make reasonable efforts to notify the supervising agency prior to serving a warrant or taking any law enforcement action against a participant in an electronic monitoring program. By imposing additional requirements on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires that when a defendant has been in custody, including, but not limited to, any time spent in a jail, camp, work furlough facility, and other specified facilities, all days of custody of the defendant, including, home detention for inmates who otherwise would be in jail in lieu of bail, are credited toward the term of imprisonment or toward any fine. Existing law also provides that the time spent in these facilities or programs qualifies as mandatory time in jail if the statute under which the defendant is sentenced requires a mandatory minimum period of time in jail. This bill would include other home detention programs for the purpose of crediting days in custody for those purposes. The bill would remove the requirement that the statute under which the defendant is sentenced requires a mandatory minimum period of time in jail in order for the time spent in those facilities or programs to qualify as mandatory time in jail. By increasing the administrative responsibilities of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that a prisoner, who, for specified reasons, is confined in or committed to a county jail, industrial farm, or road camp, or any city jail, industrial farm, or road camp, shall, for each 4-day period of custody, have one day deducted from the prisoner's period of confinement, unless it appears by the record that the prisoner has refused to satisfactorily perform labor as assigned by the sheriff, chief of police, or superintendent of an industrial farm or road camp. Existing law additionally requires for those prisoners, that for every 4 days of confinement, one day to be deducted from the prisoner's period of confinement, unless it appears by the record that the prisoner has not satisfactorily complied with the reasonable rules and regulations established by the sheriff, chief of police, or superintendent of an industrial farm or road camp. This bill would apply those provisions to persons who are participants in specified home detention programs. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

• Chaptered 09/26/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2014
• Enrolled 08/20/14 - Enrolled pdf August 20, 2014
• Amended 07/03/14 - Amended Senate pdf July 03, 2014
• Amended 07/01/14 - Amended Senate pdf July 01, 2014
• Amended 04/21/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2014
• Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
• AB2499 View text html

Action History

1. September 26, 2014

   Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 612, Statutes of 2014.

2. September 26, 2014

   Approved by the Governor.

3. August 29, 2014

   Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

4. August 18, 2014

   Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 6092.).

5. August 12, 2014

   In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

6. August 11, 2014

   Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 8. Page 4408.).

7. August 06, 2014

   Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

8. August 05, 2014

   From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 4).

9. July 03, 2014

   From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

10. July 01, 2014

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

11. June 30, 2014

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17).

12. June 03, 2014

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

13. May 15, 2014

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

14. May 05, 2014

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

15. May 05, 2014

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 0. Page 4763.)

16. May 01, 2014

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

17. April 30, 2014

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 30).

18. April 22, 2014

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

19. April 21, 2014

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

20. April 08, 2014

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

21. March 13, 2014

    Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

22. February 24, 2014

    Read first time.

23. February 23, 2014

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

24. February 21, 2014

    Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

• Bonilla · Primary

Votes

Subjects