Civil service: employee hearings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2032 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2032.
You're tracking AB 2032
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2032 — Civil service: employee hearings.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the State Personnel Board to hold hearings and make investigations concerning matters relating to the administration of the civil service. These provisions require, among other things, that a hearing or investigation be commenced within a reasonable time after the filing of the petition whenever a hearing or investigation is conducted in regard to an appeal by an employee. Existing law also authorizes an employee to make a written request for a priority hearing by the board for an appeal of an action that resulted in the employee's termination if an evidentiary hearing has not commenced within 6 months of the filing of the appeal and requires the board to schedule an evidentiary hearing within 60 days. In an appeal to the board, the appointing power bears the burden of proof that the employee was discharged for good cause. Under existing law, an employee, under certain circumstances, may seek a writ of mandate with the courts if the board does not render a decision within the statutory time limits. Under existing case law, the employee has the burden of proof in the writ of mandate proceedings that the adverse action against him or her was not supported by good cause. This bill would provide that the appointing power has the burden of proof in a proceeding for a writ of mandate brought by an employee when the board has not rendered a decision within the above-described time limit.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/18/14 - Enrolled Current pdf August 18, 2014
- Amended 08/04/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 04, 2014
- Introduced 02/20/14 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2014
- AB2032 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 15. Page 6035.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 7. Page 4373.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and APPR.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 16. Page 4427.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 2).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mia Bonta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 62 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 19% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 27 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 18% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 20% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2032 do?
- Existing law authorizes the State Personnel Board to hold hearings and make investigations concerning matters relating to the administration of the civil service. These provisions require, among other things, that a hearing or investigation be commenced within a reasonable time after the filing of the petition whenever a hearing or investigation is conducted in regard to an appeal by an employee. Existing law also authorizes an employee to make a written request for a priority hearing by the board for an appeal of an action that resulted in the employee's termination if an evidentiary hearing has not commenced within 6 months of the filing of the appeal and requires the board to schedule an evidentiary hearing within 60 days. In an appeal to the board, the appointing power bears the burden of proof that the employee was discharged for good cause. Under existing law, an employee, under certain circumstances, may seek a writ of mandate with the courts if the board does not render a decision within the statutory time limits. Under existing case law, the employee has the burden of proof in the writ of mandate proceedings that the adverse action against him or her was not supported by good cause. This bill would provide that the appointing power has the burden of proof in a proceeding for a writ of mandate brought by an employee when the board has not rendered a decision within the above-described time limit.
- Who sponsors AB 2032?
- AB 2032 is sponsored by Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2032?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2032?
- Track AB 2032 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2032
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2032
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →