Pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1892 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1892.
You're tracking AB 1892
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1892 — Pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient.
Last action — Died on third reading file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law, on or before July 1, 2014, requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to adopt a local control and accountability plan and requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to update its local control and accountability plan before July 1 of each year. Existing law requires a local control and accountability plan to include, among other things, a description of the annual goals to be achieved for each state priority, as specified, for all pupils and certain subgroups of pupils. Existing law requires a charter school petition to contain, among other things, a reasonably comprehensive description of annual goals to be achieved in each applicable state priority, as specified, for all pupils and certain subgroups of pupils, and specific annual actions to achieve those goals. Existing law requires a charter school to annually update the goals and annual actions to achieve those goals, as specified. Existing law provides that, among other things, implementation of the academic content and performance standards adopted by the State Board of Education is a state priority. This bill would add, within that state priority, identification of any specialized programs or services provided to pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient in order for them to maintain proficiency in English and access the common core academic content standards, adopted as specified, and a broad course of study that includes certain subject areas. The bill would specify that a local control and accountability plan also include a description of the annual goals to be achieved for each state priority for pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient. By requiring the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to include additional information in the local control and accountability plan, and requiring each charter school to include additional information in its annual goals, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/19/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 19, 2014
- Amended 06/26/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2014
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 23, 2014
- Amended 03/17/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 17, 2014
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
- AB1892 View text html
Action History
-
Died on third reading file.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 14).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 18).
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5254.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bocanegra · Primary
- Correa · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bocanegra
Co-sponsors (1)
- Correa
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1892 do?
- (1) Existing law, on or before July 1, 2014, requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to adopt a local control and accountability plan and requires the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to update its local control and accountability plan before July 1 of each year. Existing law requires a local control and accountability plan to include, among other things, a description of the annual goals to be achieved for each state priority, as specified, for all pupils and certain subgroups of pupils. Existing law requires a charter school petition to contain, among other things, a reasonably comprehensive description of annual goals to be achieved in each applicable state priority, as specified, for all pupils and certain subgroups of pupils, and specific annual actions to achieve those goals. Existing law requires a charter school to annually update the goals and annual actions to achieve those goals, as specified. Existing law provides that, among other things, implementation of the academic content and performance standards adopted by the State Board of Education is a state priority. This bill would add, within that state priority, identification of any specialized programs or services provided to pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient in order for them to maintain proficiency in English and access the common core academic content standards, adopted as specified, and a broad course of study that includes certain subject areas. The bill would specify that a local control and accountability plan also include a description of the annual goals to be achieved for each state priority for pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient. By requiring the governing board of each school district and each county board of education to include additional information in the local control and accountability plan, and requiring each charter school to include additional information in its annual goals, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1892?
- AB 1892 is sponsored by Bocanegra and Correa.
- What is the current status of AB 1892?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1892?
- Track AB 1892 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1892
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1892
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →