California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 69 — Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments.

Last action — Consideration of Governors veto died on file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions for a city incorporating after January 1, 2004, and on or before January 1, 2012, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code made by this bill and AB 1521, to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Consideration of Governors veto died on file.

  2. In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  3. Vetoed by the Governor.

  4. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.

  5. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 4691.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6232.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 14).

  11. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  14. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 5). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 1199.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. Ordered to second reading.

  23. Read third time and amended.

  24. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1006.) (May 23).

  26. Set for hearing May 23.

  27. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  28. Set for hearing May 20.

  29. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  30. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 785.) (May 1).

  31. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  32. Set for hearing May 1 in ED. pending receipt.

  33. (Corrected May 9).

  34. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  35. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  36. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  37. (Corrected May 9).

  38. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Emmerson · Cosponsor
  • Linder · Cosponsor
  • Melendez · Cosponsor
  • Roth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Roth

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Emmerson
  • Linder
  • Melendez

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB69 Roth Concurrence

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31006
Democratic 1002
Total 32008
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Mitchell — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 69 Roth Senate Third Reading By FOX

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70002
Democratic 4000
Republican 2001
Total 76003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Medina — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Linder — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Pan — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Nestande — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Salas — Yea
Ting — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Chau — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fong — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14001
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Weber — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Be referred to Committee on Local Government.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Brown — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wilk — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 30 Yea · 6 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27603
Democratic 3000
Total 30603
% of votes cast 77%15%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
De León — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4002
Democratic 1000
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 69 do?
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions for a city incorporating after January 1, 2004, and on or before January 1, 2012, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code made by this bill and AB 1521, to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 69?
SB 69 is sponsored by Emmerson, Linder, Melendez, and Roth.
What is the current status of SB 69?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 69?
Track SB 69 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 69

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 69

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →