California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 564 — Community redevelopment: successor agencies.

Last action — Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all assets of the former redevelopment agency, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board to approve certain actions of the successor agency, including the approval of an enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to review the actions of an oversight board. Existing law prescribes when an action of an oversight board shall become effective, subject to approval by the Department of Finance. Existing law provides that certain loan agreements entered into between a redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency are deemed enforceable obligations. Existing law provides that bond proceeds derived from bonds issued by a redevelopment agency on or before December 31, 2012, are to be used for the purposes for which the bonds are sold. Existing law provides that enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation, as specified. Existing law provides that an expenditure made pursuant to these provisions constitutes the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify the enforceable obligations described above following the effective date of the approval of those enforceable obligations after review by the oversight board and the department. Existing law establishes a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agency's real properties. Existing law requires the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law provides for the transfer of property, and the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, in a specified manner. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify a transfer of property, or the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, as described above, if the transfer, liquidation, or use of proceeds is consistent with the approved plan of the successor agency. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 34191.4 and 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by AB 662, that would become operative only if this bill and AB 662 are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.

  2. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3208.).

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 3195.)

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2307.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  13. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1792.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  25. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  27. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Mullin · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Mullin

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 564 MULLIN Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Campos — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Chau — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Levine — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB564 Mullin By Roth

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 564 MULLIN Assembly Third Reading

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 67001
Democratic 7000
Republican 3001
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Campos — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Stone — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Conway — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 564 do?
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all assets of the former redevelopment agency, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. Existing law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board to approve certain actions of the successor agency, including the approval of an enforceable obligation. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to review the actions of an oversight board. Existing law prescribes when an action of an oversight board shall become effective, subject to approval by the Department of Finance. Existing law provides that certain loan agreements entered into between a redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency are deemed enforceable obligations. Existing law provides that bond proceeds derived from bonds issued by a redevelopment agency on or before December 31, 2012, are to be used for the purposes for which the bonds are sold. Existing law provides that enforceable obligations may be satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable obligation, as specified. Existing law provides that an expenditure made pursuant to these provisions constitutes the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify the enforceable obligations described above following the effective date of the approval of those enforceable obligations after review by the oversight board and the department. Existing law establishes a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by the successor agency, to serve as the repository of the former redevelopment agency's real properties. Existing law requires the successor agency to prepare a long-range property management plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. Existing law provides for the transfer of property, and the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, in a specified manner. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify a transfer of property, or the liquidation of property and the use of proceeds, as described above, if the transfer, liquidation, or use of proceeds is consistent with the approved plan of the successor agency. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 34191.4 and 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by AB 662, that would become operative only if this bill and AB 662 are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 564?
AB 564 is sponsored by Mullin.
What is the current status of AB 564?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 564?
Track AB 564 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 564

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 564

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →