AB 2066 — Tribal gaming: local agencies.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund for the receipt and deposit of moneys received by the state from certain Indian tribes pursuant to the terms of gaming compacts entered into with the state. Existing law authorizes moneys in that fund to be used for specified purposes, including for grants for the support of state and local government agencies impacted by tribal government gaming. Existing law, until January 1, 2021, creates a County Tribal Casino Account in the treasury of each county that contains a tribal casino, which is funded according to specified formulas. Existing law requires the Controller to divide the County Tribal Casino Account for each county that has gaming devices that are subject to an obligation to make contributions to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund into a separate account, known as an Individual Tribal Casino Account, for each tribe that operates a casino within the county. Each Individual Tribal Casino Account is required to be funded in proportion to the amount that each individual tribe paid in the prior fiscal year to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, and used for grants to local agencies impacted by tribal casinos, as specified. Existing law establishes an Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee in each county in which gaming is conducted, specifies the composition and responsibilities of that committee, and requires that committee to make the selection of grants from the casino accounts. Among other things, the committee is responsible for establishing all application policies and procedures for grants from the casino accounts. Existing law requires funds not allocated from a County Tribal Casino Account or an Individual Tribal Casino Account for the grants by the end of each fiscal year to revert back to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, except for moneys allocated for specified fiscal years, which are required to be eligible for expenditure through the calendar year. This bill would delete the obsolete provisions relating to allocations made in those specified fiscal years.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill AB 2066, a specific line has been added to clarify the text. This change aims to improve understanding and ensure that the intentions of the bill are clear to everyone involved. It's important because clearer language helps prevent misinterpretation and makes it easier for people to follow the law and its implications.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/20/14 - Introduced Current pdf February 20, 2014
- AB2066 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Hill.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24).
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4964.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Hall · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hall
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2066 do?
- Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund for the receipt and deposit of moneys received by the state from certain Indian tribes pursuant to the terms of gaming compacts entered into with the state. Existing law authorizes moneys in that fund to be used for specified purposes, including for grants for the support of state and local government agencies impacted by tribal government gaming. Existing law, until January 1, 2021, creates a County Tribal Casino Account in the treasury of each county that contains a tribal casino, which is funded according to specified formulas. Existing law requires the Controller to divide the County Tribal Casino Account for each county that has gaming devices that are subject to an obligation to make contributions to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund into a separate account, known as an Individual Tribal Casino Account, for each tribe that operates a casino within the county. Each Individual Tribal Casino Account is required to be funded in proportion to the amount that each individual tribe paid in the prior fiscal year to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, and used for grants to local agencies impacted by tribal casinos, as specified. Existing law establishes an Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee in each county in which gaming is conducted, specifies the composition and responsibilities of that committee, and requires that committee to make the selection of grants from the casino accounts. Among other things, the committee is responsible for establishing all application policies and procedures for grants from the casino accounts. Existing law requires funds not allocated from a County Tribal Casino Account or an Individual Tribal Casino Account for the grants by the end of each fiscal year to revert back to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund, except for moneys allocated for specified fiscal years, which are required to be eligible for expenditure through the calendar year. This bill would delete the obsolete provisions relating to allocations made in those specified fiscal years.
- Who sponsors AB 2066?
- AB 2066 is sponsored by Hall.
- What is the current status of AB 2066?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2066?
- Track AB 2066 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2066
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2066
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →