Foster care.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1089 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1089.
You're tracking AB 1089
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1089 — Foster care.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 761, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act authorizes the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and support to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan or individualized family service plan developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Existing law also provides that if a consumer is or has been determined to be eligible for services by a regional center, he or she shall also be considered eligible by any other regional center if he or she has moved to another location within the state. In addition, existing law provides that whenever a consumer transfers from one regional center catchment area to another, the level and types of services and supports specified in the consumer's individual program plan shall be authorized and secured, as specified. This bill would specify the transfer procedures that would apply when a consumer of regional center services who has an order for foster care, is awaiting foster care placement, or is placed in out-of-home care transfers between regional centers. Among other things, the bill would require the county social worker or county probation officer to immediately send a notice of relocation, as defined, to the sending regional center of the consumer who meets the criteria set forth above, and would require the sending regional center to immediately send a notice of transfer, as defined, and records needed for the planning process to the receiving regional center, as specified. The bill would establish specific timelines and procedures for making these transfers. By imposing new duties and a higher level of service on county employees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include a statement of legislative findings and declarations. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2014
- Enrolled 08/22/14 - Enrolled pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 08/04/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 04, 2014
- Amended 06/12/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 12, 2014
- Amended 05/15/14 - Amended Senate pdf May 15, 2014
- Amended 06/17/13 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2013
- Amended 04/18/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 18, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- AB1089 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 761, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6271.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4615.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 14).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 10).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 1595.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 15).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Brown · Cosponsor
- Maienschein · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Lisa Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
Co-sponsors (4)
- Brown
- Maienschein
- Ting
- Wilk
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 72 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1089 do?
- The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act authorizes the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and support to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan or individualized family service plan developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Existing law also provides that if a consumer is or has been determined to be eligible for services by a regional center, he or she shall also be considered eligible by any other regional center if he or she has moved to another location within the state. In addition, existing law provides that whenever a consumer transfers from one regional center catchment area to another, the level and types of services and supports specified in the consumer's individual program plan shall be authorized and secured, as specified. This bill would specify the transfer procedures that would apply when a consumer of regional center services who has an order for foster care, is awaiting foster care placement, or is placed in out-of-home care transfers between regional centers. Among other things, the bill would require the county social worker or county probation officer to immediately send a notice of relocation, as defined, to the sending regional center of the consumer who meets the criteria set forth above, and would require the sending regional center to immediately send a notice of transfer, as defined, and records needed for the planning process to the receiving regional center, as specified. The bill would establish specific timelines and procedures for making these transfers. By imposing new duties and a higher level of service on county employees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include a statement of legislative findings and declarations. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1089?
- AB 1089 is sponsored by Brown, Maienschein, Ting, Wilk, and Calderon, Lisa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1089?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1089?
- Track AB 1089 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1089
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1089
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →