SB 985 — Stormwater resource planning.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Stormwater Resource Planning Act, authorizes a city, county, or special district, to develop a stormwater resource plan that meets certain standards. This bill would authorize one or more public agencies to develop a stormwater resource plan. The bill would expand the standards to include dry weather runoff. This bill would require a stormwater resource plan to be submitted to any applicable regional water management group, to identify and prioritize stormwater and dry weather runoff capture projects for implementation in a prescribed quantitative manner, and to prioritize the use of lands or easements in public ownership for stormwater and dry weather runoff projects. This bill would eliminate the requirement that a stormwater resource plan be consistent with any applicable integrated regional water management plan. This bill would require an entity developing a stormwater resource plan to identify in the plan opportunities to use existing publicly owned lands and easements to capture, clean, store, and use stormwater and dry weather runoff either onsite or offsite. This bill would require the State Water Resources Control Board, by July 1, 2016, to establish guidance for purposes of these provisions. This bill would require the development of a stormwater resource plan and compliance with these provisions to receive grants for stormwater and dry weather runoff capture projects from a bond act approved by the voters after January 1, 2014, except as provided. This bill would define dry weather runoff and stormwater for the purposes of the act and conform the definition of stormwater in the Rainwater Capture Act of 2012.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/25/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 25, 2014
- Enrolled 09/02/14 - Enrolled pdf September 02, 2014
- Amended 08/18/14 - Amended Assembly pdf August 18, 2014
- Amended 06/24/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 24, 2014
- Amended 06/10/14 - Amended Assembly pdf June 10, 2014
- Amended 05/07/14 - Amended Senate pdf May 07, 2014
- Amended 04/09/14 - Amended Senate pdf April 09, 2014
- Introduced 02/11/14 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2014
- SB985 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4943.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 22. Page 6542.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 14).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 6.) (June 17).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 3. Page 3598.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3706.) (May 23).
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3341.) (April 30).
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3214.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and E.Q.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 28% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 19 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 28% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 40% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Bocanegra | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 8% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 985 do?
- Existing law, the Stormwater Resource Planning Act, authorizes a city, county, or special district, to develop a stormwater resource plan that meets certain standards. This bill would authorize one or more public agencies to develop a stormwater resource plan. The bill would expand the standards to include dry weather runoff. This bill would require a stormwater resource plan to be submitted to any applicable regional water management group, to identify and prioritize stormwater and dry weather runoff capture projects for implementation in a prescribed quantitative manner, and to prioritize the use of lands or easements in public ownership for stormwater and dry weather runoff projects. This bill would eliminate the requirement that a stormwater resource plan be consistent with any applicable integrated regional water management plan. This bill would require an entity developing a stormwater resource plan to identify in the plan opportunities to use existing publicly owned lands and easements to capture, clean, store, and use stormwater and dry weather runoff either onsite or offsite. This bill would require the State Water Resources Control Board, by July 1, 2016, to establish guidance for purposes of these provisions. This bill would require the development of a stormwater resource plan and compliance with these provisions to receive grants for stormwater and dry weather runoff capture projects from a bond act approved by the voters after January 1, 2014, except as provided. This bill would define dry weather runoff and stormwater for the purposes of the act and conform the definition of stormwater in the Rainwater Capture Act of 2012.
- Who sponsors SB 985?
- SB 985 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 985?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 985?
- Track SB 985 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 985
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 985
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →