Electricity: distributed generation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2441 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2441.
You're tracking AB 2441
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2441 — Electricity: distributed generation.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law requires the commission to require each electrical corporation under the operational control of the Independent System Operator as of January 1, 2001, to modify tariffs so that all customers that install new distributed energy resources, as defined, in accordance with specified criteria are served under rates, rules, and requirements identical to those of a customer within the same rate schedule that does not use distributed energy resources, and to withdraw any provisions in otherwise applicable tariffs that activate other tariffs, rates, or rules if a customer uses distributed energy resources. Existing law provides, notwithstanding these requirements, that a customer that installs new distributed energy resources not be exempted from (1) reasonable interconnection charges, (2) charges imposed pursuant to the Reliable Electric Service Investment Act, and (3) charges imposed to repay the Department of Water Resources for electricity procurement expenses incurred in response to the electricity crisis of 2000–01. Existing law requires the commission, in establishing the rates applicable to customers that install new distributed energy resources, to create a firewall that segregates distribution cost recovery so that any net costs, taking into account the actual costs and benefits of distributed energy resources, proportional to each customer class, as determined by the commission, resulting from the tariff modifications granted to members of each customer class may be recovered only from that class. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to clean onsite electricity generation and nonbypassable charges. The bill would, to the extent authorized by federal law, require the commission, by July 1, 2015, to establish a pilot program to do both of the following for those electrical corporation customers that have operational clean distributed energy resources, as defined: (1) require each electrical corporation to collect all applicable nonbypassable charges fixed or imposed by the commission based only on the actual metered consumption of electricity delivered to the customer through the electrical corporation's transmission or distribution system, and (2) calculate a reservation capacity for standby service, if applicable, based on the capacity needed by an electrical corporation to serve a customer's electrical demand during an outage of the clean distributed energy resource providing electric service for that customer. The bill would require the commission to suspend the eligibility of additional customers to participate in the pilot program when 500 megawatts of nameplate generating capacity from clean distributed energy resources has become operational statewide pursuant to the pilot program. The bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to report to the Legislature on the impact of the pilot program upon specified matter by July 1, 2020, or when 450 megawatts of nameplate generating capacity from clean distributed energy resources has become operational pursuant to the pilot program, whichever comes sooner. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/20/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 20, 2014
- Amended 06/11/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 11, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2441 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 4. Page 4750.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (April 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 1.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Mullin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mullin
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 70 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 5% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2441 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law requires the commission to require each electrical corporation under the operational control of the Independent System Operator as of January 1, 2001, to modify tariffs so that all customers that install new distributed energy resources, as defined, in accordance with specified criteria are served under rates, rules, and requirements identical to those of a customer within the same rate schedule that does not use distributed energy resources, and to withdraw any provisions in otherwise applicable tariffs that activate other tariffs, rates, or rules if a customer uses distributed energy resources. Existing law provides, notwithstanding these requirements, that a customer that installs new distributed energy resources not be exempted from (1) reasonable interconnection charges, (2) charges imposed pursuant to the Reliable Electric Service Investment Act, and (3) charges imposed to repay the Department of Water Resources for electricity procurement expenses incurred in response to the electricity crisis of 2000–01. Existing law requires the commission, in establishing the rates applicable to customers that install new distributed energy resources, to create a firewall that segregates distribution cost recovery so that any net costs, taking into account the actual costs and benefits of distributed energy resources, proportional to each customer class, as determined by the commission, resulting from the tariff modifications granted to members of each customer class may be recovered only from that class. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to clean onsite electricity generation and nonbypassable charges. The bill would, to the extent authorized by federal law, require the commission, by July 1, 2015, to establish a pilot program to do both of the following for those electrical corporation customers that have operational clean distributed energy resources, as defined: (1) require each electrical corporation to collect all applicable nonbypassable charges fixed or imposed by the commission based only on the actual metered consumption of electricity delivered to the customer through the electrical corporation's transmission or distribution system, and (2) calculate a reservation capacity for standby service, if applicable, based on the capacity needed by an electrical corporation to serve a customer's electrical demand during an outage of the clean distributed energy resource providing electric service for that customer. The bill would require the commission to suspend the eligibility of additional customers to participate in the pilot program when 500 megawatts of nameplate generating capacity from clean distributed energy resources has become operational statewide pursuant to the pilot program. The bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to report to the Legislature on the impact of the pilot program upon specified matter by July 1, 2020, or when 450 megawatts of nameplate generating capacity from clean distributed energy resources has become operational pursuant to the pilot program, whichever comes sooner. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2441?
- AB 2441 is sponsored by Mullin.
- What is the current status of AB 2441?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2441?
- Track AB 2441 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2441
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2441
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →