California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 7 — Public works: charter cities.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 794, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, be paid to workers employed on public works projects. Existing law defines "public works" to include, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds, and street, sewer, or other improvement work done under the direction and supervision or by the authority of any officer or public body of the state, or of any political subdivision or district thereof, whether the political subdivision or district operates under a freeholder's charter or not. This bill would prohibit a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for a construction project if the city has a charter provision or ordinance that authorizes a contractor to not comply with prevailing wage provisions on any public works contract. The bill would, except as specified, prohibit a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for a construction project if the city has awarded, within the prior 2 years, a public works contract without requiring the contractor to comply with prevailing wage provisions. This bill would authorize charter cities to receive or use state funding or financial assistance if the city has a local prevailing wage ordinance, applicable to all of its public works contracts, that includes requirements that are equal to or greater than the state's prevailing wage requirements, as specified. This bill would exclude contracts for projects of $25,000 or less for construction work, or projects of $15,000 or less for alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance work. This bill would require the Director of Industrial Relations to maintain a list of charter cities that may receive and use state funding or financial assistance for their construction projects. This bill would provide that it does not restrict a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance that was awarded to the city prior to January 1, 2015, or from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance to complete a contract that was awarded prior to January 1, 2015, and that a charter city would not be disqualified from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for its construction projects based on the city's failure to require a contractor to comply with prevailing wage provisions in performing a contract the city advertised for bid or awarded prior to January 1, 2015.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 794, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 2172.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 52. Noes 22. Page 2869.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 30).

  9. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  13. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and L. & E.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1094.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1004.) (May 23).

  18. Set for hearing May 23.

  19. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  20. Set for hearing April 8.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 291.) (March 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Set for hearing March 13.

  23. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  24. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  25. From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 3.

  26. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cannella · Cosponsor
  • Steinberg · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Steinberg

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Cannella

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 22 Yea · 13 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201204
Democratic 2100
Total 221304
% of votes cast 56%33%0%10%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Wright — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Torres — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Walters — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 52 Yea · 22 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 491903
Democratic 3001
Republican 0300
Total 522204
% of votes cast 67%28%0%5%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Pan — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Allen — Nay
Chau — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Melendez — Not Voting
Bigelow — Nay
Conway — Nay
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Not Voting
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 10 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26901
Democratic 2100
Total 281001
% of votes cast 72%26%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Price — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De León — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Knight — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 7 do?
Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, be paid to workers employed on public works projects. Existing law defines "public works" to include, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds, and street, sewer, or other improvement work done under the direction and supervision or by the authority of any officer or public body of the state, or of any political subdivision or district thereof, whether the political subdivision or district operates under a freeholder's charter or not. This bill would prohibit a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for a construction project if the city has a charter provision or ordinance that authorizes a contractor to not comply with prevailing wage provisions on any public works contract. The bill would, except as specified, prohibit a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for a construction project if the city has awarded, within the prior 2 years, a public works contract without requiring the contractor to comply with prevailing wage provisions. This bill would authorize charter cities to receive or use state funding or financial assistance if the city has a local prevailing wage ordinance, applicable to all of its public works contracts, that includes requirements that are equal to or greater than the state's prevailing wage requirements, as specified. This bill would exclude contracts for projects of $25,000 or less for construction work, or projects of $15,000 or less for alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance work. This bill would require the Director of Industrial Relations to maintain a list of charter cities that may receive and use state funding or financial assistance for their construction projects. This bill would provide that it does not restrict a charter city from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance that was awarded to the city prior to January 1, 2015, or from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance to complete a contract that was awarded prior to January 1, 2015, and that a charter city would not be disqualified from receiving or using state funding or financial assistance for its construction projects based on the city's failure to require a contractor to comply with prevailing wage provisions in performing a contract the city advertised for bid or awarded prior to January 1, 2015.
Who sponsors SB 7?
SB 7 is sponsored by Cannella and Steinberg.
What is the current status of SB 7?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 03, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 7?
Track SB 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 7

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 7

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →