AB 485 — In-home supportive services.
Last action — Died on unfinished business file, concurrence pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act, which serves to resolve disputes regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment between the California In-Home Supportive Services Authority (Statewide Authority) and recognized employee organizations providing in-home supportive services. Existing law establishes the Statewide Authority and requires the authority to be the entity authorized to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organizations for any individual provider who is employed by a recipient of supportive services. Existing law provides, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, that IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health care plans in specified counties and requires enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries into managed care pursuant to a specified demonstration project or other provisions, including managed care for long-term services and supports, as one of the conditions that would be required to be completed before the Statewide Authority assumes the specified responsibilities. Existing law provides that no sooner than March 1, 2013, the Statewide Authority shall assume specified responsibilities in a county or city and county upon notification by the Director of Health Care Services that the enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries described in specified provisions of law has been completed in that county or city and county. Under existing law, in counties where IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health plans, those health plans are required to assume specified duties, including entering into a memorandum of understanding with a county agency to perform specified activities, after the director provides that notification. Under existing law, the assumption of these responsibilities by the Statewide Authority is also known as the county implementation date. This bill would, instead, make the implementation date January 1, 2015, would delete the reference to the "county" implementation date, and would make conforming changes. Existing law conditions implementation of the Coordinated Care Initiative, as defined, on whether the Director of Finance estimates that the Coordinated Care Initiative will generate net General Fund savings, as specified. Existing law, with certain exceptions, specifies those provisions of law that are within the scope of the initiative to become inoperative if this condition is not met. This bill would modify the definition of the Coordinate Care Initiative for the purposes of determining which provisions become inoperative if the condition is not met, and exclude, among others, those provisions that establish the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act, establish the Statewide Authority and determine the duties of, and when those duties are assumed by, the authority, establish the IHSS Fund, which is used to fund the Statewide Authority, and require all counties, commencing July 1, 2012, to have a County IHSS Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and to pay the County IHSS MOE instead of paying the nonfederal share of IHSS costs, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes.
Bill Text
- Amended 02/18/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf February 18, 2014
- Amended 01/17/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 17, 2014
- Amended 09/06/13 - Amended Senate pdf September 06, 2013
- Introduced 02/19/13 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2013
- AB485 View text html
Action History
-
Died on unfinished business file, concurrence pending.
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 14).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5998.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after February 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 7. Page 2819.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (January 23).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (January 15).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (September 11). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 27. Noes 6. Page 2315.)
-
Joint Rule 61(a) suspended. (Ayes 27. Noes 6. Page 2315.)
-
Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1790.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (May 24).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gomez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gomez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 18% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 22 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 28% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 6% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 485 do?
- Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act, which serves to resolve disputes regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment between the California In-Home Supportive Services Authority (Statewide Authority) and recognized employee organizations providing in-home supportive services. Existing law establishes the Statewide Authority and requires the authority to be the entity authorized to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organizations for any individual provider who is employed by a recipient of supportive services. Existing law provides, as part of the Coordinated Care Initiative, that IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health care plans in specified counties and requires enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries into managed care pursuant to a specified demonstration project or other provisions, including managed care for long-term services and supports, as one of the conditions that would be required to be completed before the Statewide Authority assumes the specified responsibilities. Existing law provides that no sooner than March 1, 2013, the Statewide Authority shall assume specified responsibilities in a county or city and county upon notification by the Director of Health Care Services that the enrollment of eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries described in specified provisions of law has been completed in that county or city and county. Under existing law, in counties where IHSS is a Medi-Cal benefit available through managed care health plans, those health plans are required to assume specified duties, including entering into a memorandum of understanding with a county agency to perform specified activities, after the director provides that notification. Under existing law, the assumption of these responsibilities by the Statewide Authority is also known as the county implementation date. This bill would, instead, make the implementation date January 1, 2015, would delete the reference to the "county" implementation date, and would make conforming changes. Existing law conditions implementation of the Coordinated Care Initiative, as defined, on whether the Director of Finance estimates that the Coordinated Care Initiative will generate net General Fund savings, as specified. Existing law, with certain exceptions, specifies those provisions of law that are within the scope of the initiative to become inoperative if this condition is not met. This bill would modify the definition of the Coordinate Care Initiative for the purposes of determining which provisions become inoperative if the condition is not met, and exclude, among others, those provisions that establish the In-Home Supportive Services Employer-Employee Relations Act, establish the Statewide Authority and determine the duties of, and when those duties are assumed by, the authority, establish the IHSS Fund, which is used to fund the Statewide Authority, and require all counties, commencing July 1, 2012, to have a County IHSS Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and to pay the County IHSS MOE instead of paying the nonfederal share of IHSS costs, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes.
- Who sponsors AB 485?
- AB 485 is sponsored by Gomez.
- What is the current status of AB 485?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 485?
- Track AB 485 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 485
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 485
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →