Vehicles: emergency vehicles.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 573 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 573.
You're tracking SB 573
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 573 — Vehicles: emergency vehicles.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to issue authorized emergency vehicle permits for specified vehicles, and then only upon a finding in each case that the vehicle is used in responding to emergency calls for fire or law enforcement or for the immediate preservation of life or property or for the apprehension of law violators. This bill would authorize the commissioner to issue an emergency vehicle permit to a vehicle owned and operated by a hospital designated by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services as a disaster resource center hospital at the request of the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency or the state's Office of Emergency Services, if the vehicle is used exclusively to transport mass casualty decontamination apparatus medical supplies, lifesaving equipment, or personnel to the scene of an emergency, as specified. The bill would require the hospital responsible for operating the vehicle to provide emergency vehicle operations training to the designated vehicle operators, to maintain a record of the training in the vehicle, to ensure that the designated vehicle operators maintain an appropriate class of driver's license, and to maintain insurance coverage for the vehicle. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/17/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 17, 2014
- Amended 01/15/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 15, 2014
- Amended 01/06/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 06, 2014
- Amended 04/04/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 04, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB573 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Returned to Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 2636.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing January 21.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 2591.) (January 14).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing January 14.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lieu
Co-sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 13% | 6% | 0% | 81% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 573 do?
- Existing law authorizes the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to issue authorized emergency vehicle permits for specified vehicles, and then only upon a finding in each case that the vehicle is used in responding to emergency calls for fire or law enforcement or for the immediate preservation of life or property or for the apprehension of law violators. This bill would authorize the commissioner to issue an emergency vehicle permit to a vehicle owned and operated by a hospital designated by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services as a disaster resource center hospital at the request of the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency or the state's Office of Emergency Services, if the vehicle is used exclusively to transport mass casualty decontamination apparatus medical supplies, lifesaving equipment, or personnel to the scene of an emergency, as specified. The bill would require the hospital responsible for operating the vehicle to provide emergency vehicle operations training to the designated vehicle operators, to maintain a record of the training in the vehicle, to ensure that the designated vehicle operators maintain an appropriate class of driver's license, and to maintain insurance coverage for the vehicle. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.
- Who sponsors SB 573?
- SB 573 is sponsored by Bloom and Lieu.
- What is the current status of SB 573?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 573?
- Track SB 573 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 573
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 573
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →