Family law: parentage.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2344 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2344.
You're tracking AB 2344
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2344 — Family law: parentage.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 636, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Uniform Parentage Act defines the parent and child relationship as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child's parents, including the mother and child relationship and the father and child relationship, and governs proceedings to establish that relationship. Under existing law the donor of semen provided to a licensed physician and surgeon or to a licensed sperm bank for use in assisted reproduction of a woman other than the donor's spouse is treated at law as if he were not the natural parent of the child thereby conceived unless otherwise agreed in a writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception of the child. This bill would establish statutory forms for assisted reproduction to provide clarity regarding a person's intent to be a legal parent if he or she is using assisted reproduction at the time of conception. The bill would state that the forms satisfy the writing requirement described above, but would state that use of the forms would not be required to satisfy that writing requirement. (2) Existing law establishes the process by which a person may be adopted by a stepparent who is married to or is the domestic partner of the person's parent. Existing law requires that each case of stepparent adoption be investigated by certain individuals or entities, including a probation officer, private licensed adoption agency, or county welfare department in the county in which the adoption proceeding is pending. Under existing law, the prospective adoptive parent is liable for all reasonable costs incurred in connection with the stepparent adoption, including costs incurred for the investigation. Existing law also requires the prospective adoptive parents to be examined by the court, as specified. This bill would establish a procedure for conducting a stepparent adoption involving a spouse or partner who gave birth to the child during the marriage or domestic partnership, and would exempt these adoptions from the requirements that a home visit or home study be performed, that the prospective adoptive parent appear before the court, and that the prospective adoptive parent be liable for all reasonable costs incurred in connection with the stepparent adoption, unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause. The bill would make related and conforming changes. (3) Existing law requires an assisted reproduction agreement for gestational carriers to include the date on which the assisted reproduction agreement was executed, the persons from which the gametes originated, unless anonymously donated, and the identity of the intended parent or parents. This bill would require a disclosure of the manner in which the intended parents will cover the medical expenses of the gestational carrier and of the newborn, as provided.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/26/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2014
- Enrolled 08/22/14 - Enrolled pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 06/24/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 24, 2014
- Amended 06/09/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 09, 2014
- Amended 04/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- AB2344 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 636, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 5. Page 6214.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 3. Page 4553.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 17).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 4. Page 5016.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (May 14).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ammiano
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 65 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 6% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 28 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 8% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 62 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 5% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 6% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2344 do?
- (1) The Uniform Parentage Act defines the parent and child relationship as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child's parents, including the mother and child relationship and the father and child relationship, and governs proceedings to establish that relationship. Under existing law the donor of semen provided to a licensed physician and surgeon or to a licensed sperm bank for use in assisted reproduction of a woman other than the donor's spouse is treated at law as if he were not the natural parent of the child thereby conceived unless otherwise agreed in a writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception of the child. This bill would establish statutory forms for assisted reproduction to provide clarity regarding a person's intent to be a legal parent if he or she is using assisted reproduction at the time of conception. The bill would state that the forms satisfy the writing requirement described above, but would state that use of the forms would not be required to satisfy that writing requirement. (2) Existing law establishes the process by which a person may be adopted by a stepparent who is married to or is the domestic partner of the person's parent. Existing law requires that each case of stepparent adoption be investigated by certain individuals or entities, including a probation officer, private licensed adoption agency, or county welfare department in the county in which the adoption proceeding is pending. Under existing law, the prospective adoptive parent is liable for all reasonable costs incurred in connection with the stepparent adoption, including costs incurred for the investigation. Existing law also requires the prospective adoptive parents to be examined by the court, as specified. This bill would establish a procedure for conducting a stepparent adoption involving a spouse or partner who gave birth to the child during the marriage or domestic partnership, and would exempt these adoptions from the requirements that a home visit or home study be performed, that the prospective adoptive parent appear before the court, and that the prospective adoptive parent be liable for all reasonable costs incurred in connection with the stepparent adoption, unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause. The bill would make related and conforming changes. (3) Existing law requires an assisted reproduction agreement for gestational carriers to include the date on which the assisted reproduction agreement was executed, the persons from which the gametes originated, unless anonymously donated, and the identity of the intended parent or parents. This bill would require a disclosure of the manner in which the intended parents will cover the medical expenses of the gestational carrier and of the newborn, as provided.
- Who sponsors AB 2344?
- AB 2344 is sponsored by Ammiano.
- What is the current status of AB 2344?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2344?
- Track AB 2344 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2344
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2344
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →