California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 822 — Local government retirement plans.

Last action — Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires local legislative bodies, before authorizing changes in public retirement plan benefits or other postemployment benefits, to secure the services of an actuary to provide a statement of the actuarial impact of the changes. This bill would require, whenever a local ordinance or measure qualifies for the ballot that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit plan of employees of a local government entity, whether by initiative or legislative action, the governing body of the local government entity to secure the services of an independent actuary to provide a statement, or a summary of the statement, not to exceed 500 words in length, of the actuarial impact of the proposed measure upon future annual costs of the retirement benefit plan, and to have this statement printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The bill would require a specified notice regarding obtaining a copy of the measure to be printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot, if the text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The requirements of the bill would apply to a city, including a charter city; a county, including a charter county; a city and county, including a charter city and county; a community college district; or a special district. By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.

  2. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 3112.).

  6. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  7. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2250.).

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).

  12. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 3).

  15. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 18).

  17. Referred to Coms. on E. & C.A. and GOV. & F.

  18. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  19. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 19. Page 1572.)

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 15).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Read second time and amended.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 23).

  25. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  26. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and E. & R.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hall · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hall

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 822 HALL Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 57 Yea · 19 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 531602
Democratic 4000
Republican 0300
Total 571902
% of votes cast 73%24%0%3%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Conway — Nay
Campos — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hall — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Holden — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Perea — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Salas — Yea
Allen — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Logue — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 27 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241101
Democratic 3000
Total 271101
% of votes cast 69%28%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hueso — Yea
De León — Yea
Knight — Nay
Beall — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Nay
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB822 Hall Amend by Anderson Lay on Table

Passed 26 Yea · 11 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231102
Democratic 3000
Total 261102
% of votes cast 67%28%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Steinberg — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wright — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Walters — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
De León — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 822 HALL Assembly Third Reading

Passed 52 Yea · 19 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 461605
Democratic 6100
Republican 0202
Total 521907
% of votes cast 67%24%0%9%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Chávez — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 822 do?
Existing law requires local legislative bodies, before authorizing changes in public retirement plan benefits or other postemployment benefits, to secure the services of an actuary to provide a statement of the actuarial impact of the changes. This bill would require, whenever a local ordinance or measure qualifies for the ballot that proposes to alter, replace, or eliminate the retirement benefit plan of employees of a local government entity, whether by initiative or legislative action, the governing body of the local government entity to secure the services of an independent actuary to provide a statement, or a summary of the statement, not to exceed 500 words in length, of the actuarial impact of the proposed measure upon future annual costs of the retirement benefit plan, and to have this statement printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The bill would require a specified notice regarding obtaining a copy of the measure to be printed in the voter information portion of the sample ballot, if the text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot. The requirements of the bill would apply to a city, including a charter city; a county, including a charter county; a city and county, including a charter city and county; a community college district; or a special district. By imposing new requirements on local governments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 822?
AB 822 is sponsored by Hall.
What is the current status of AB 822?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 822?
Track AB 822 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 822

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 822

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →