California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 538 — Firearms.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 738, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, subject to specified exceptions, makes it a crime to openly carry an exposed, unloaded handgun outside a vehicle in specified public places. Existing law exempts from this crime, in part, the open carrying of an unloaded handgun at an auction or similar event for a nonprofit public benefit or mutual benefit corporation, if the handgun is to be auctioned or sold for the nonprofit public benefit or mutual benefit corporation, and the handgun is delivered by a person licensed by existing law. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) Existing law, subject to specified exceptions, including use by a member of a club or organization organized for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets upon established target ranges while the members are using handguns upon the target ranges or incident to the use of a firearm that is not a handgun at that target range, makes it a crime for a person to carry an unloaded firearm that is not a handgun outside a vehicle while in an incorporated city or city and county. This bill would clarify that the exception applies to members of a shooting organization while the members are using firearms that are not handguns upon the target ranges and would make additional technical changes. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from selling, leasing, or transferring a firearm unless the person is issued a license. Existing law provides for specified exemptions to that licensing requirement, including the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm by a law enforcement agency to a peace officer or retiring peace officer, as specified. This bill would also exempt from the licensing requirement the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm if made by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government, to a licensed firearms dealer, a wholesaler, or a licensed manufacturer or importer of firearms or ammunition, if certain specified requirements are met. If the authorized law enforcement representative sells, delivers, or transfers a firearm to a licensed firearms dealer, the bill would require the governmental agency to enter a record of the delivery into the Automated Firearms Systems (AFS) via the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) within 10 days. (4) Existing law imposes various other restrictions on the sale, delivery, or transfer of firearms. Existing law excludes from those provisions the sale, delivery, or transfer of firearms made to an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government for exclusive use by that governmental agency, if certain conditions are met. Existing law provides that within 10 days of the date a firearm is acquired by the agency, a record shall be entered as an institutional weapon into the AFS via the CLETS. This bill would require an agency that subsequently destroys that weapon to enter information that the weapon has been destroyed into the AFS via the CLETS within 10 days of destruction. (5) Existing law provides that when neither party to a firearms transaction holds a dealer's license, the parties to the transaction are required to complete the sale, loan, or transfer of that firearm through a firearms dealer, except as specified. This bill would exclude from those provisions the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm if made by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government if certain specified conditions are met, including that the sale, delivery, or transfer is made to a wholesaler, or a licensed manufacturer, or importer of firearms or ammunition. The bill would require the agency to enter a record of the delivery into the AFS via the CLETS within 10 days. (6) Existing law requires the register or record of an electronic or telephonic transfer of a firearm to include specified information, including information on certain waiting period exemptions, including a dealer waiting period exemption, and requires the firearms dealer to record on the register or record the date that the firearm is delivered. A violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill instead would require the register or record to include any applicable waiting period exemption information. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the register or record to include a statement that the Department of Justice shall furnish the purchaser with any information reported to the department relating to the purchaser's ownership of the firearm, that the purchaser is entitled to file a report of his or her acquisition of the firearm, and of instructions for accessing the department's Internet Web site for more information. The bill would require the firearms dealer to record his or her signature indicating delivery of the firearm, and would require the purchaser to sign the register or record on the date that the firearm is delivered to the purchaser. (7) Existing law requires the purchaser of a firearm to present evidence to the dealer of the person's identity and age, and requires the transaction to be recorded by the dealer in a register or record of telephonic or electronic transfer. Existing law requires a dealer, upon request only, to provide a copy of the register or record of the transaction to the purchaser, and, for a private party transaction, requires the dealer, upon request, to provide the seller or purchaser with a copy of the register or record, as specified. This bill instead would require the dealer to provide a copy of those documents to the purchaser at the time of delivery of the firearm after the dealer notes the date of delivery and the dealer's signature indicating delivery of the firearm, and the dealer and purchaser acknowledge the receipt of the firearm. The bill, for private party transactions, would require the dealer to provide a copy of the register or record to the seller at the time that the register or record is signed by the seller. (8) Existing law prohibits a person from purchasing or receiving a handgun, except an antique firearm, without a valid handgun safety certificate, and further prohibits a person from selling, delivering, loaning, or transferring a handgun to a person who does not possess a valid handgun safety certificate, except as specified. This bill would exclude the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government if certain conditions are met, including that the sale, delivery, or transfer is made to one of specified persons and entities. (9) The bill would make conforming changes. (10) This bill would incorporate changes to Section 28160 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 683 that would become operative if this bill and SB 683 are both chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 738, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 2920.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 2107.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 24).

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  13. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 23. Page 1513.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 8).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Read second time and amended.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 23).

  21. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Pan · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Pan

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 52 Yea · 26 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482300
Democratic 4000
Republican 0300
Total 522600
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hall — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Campos — Yea
Allen — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Fox — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201402
Democratic 2001
Total 221403
% of votes cast 56%36%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Block — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De León — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Correa — Nay
Hancock — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Roth — Nay
Torres — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 50 Yea · 23 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 441805
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 502305
% of votes cast 64%29%0%6%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chesbro — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Fox — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Nay
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 538 do?
(1) Existing law, subject to specified exceptions, makes it a crime to openly carry an exposed, unloaded handgun outside a vehicle in specified public places. Existing law exempts from this crime, in part, the open carrying of an unloaded handgun at an auction or similar event for a nonprofit public benefit or mutual benefit corporation, if the handgun is to be auctioned or sold for the nonprofit public benefit or mutual benefit corporation, and the handgun is delivered by a person licensed by existing law. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) Existing law, subject to specified exceptions, including use by a member of a club or organization organized for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets upon established target ranges while the members are using handguns upon the target ranges or incident to the use of a firearm that is not a handgun at that target range, makes it a crime for a person to carry an unloaded firearm that is not a handgun outside a vehicle while in an incorporated city or city and county. This bill would clarify that the exception applies to members of a shooting organization while the members are using firearms that are not handguns upon the target ranges and would make additional technical changes. (3) Existing law prohibits a person from selling, leasing, or transferring a firearm unless the person is issued a license. Existing law provides for specified exemptions to that licensing requirement, including the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm by a law enforcement agency to a peace officer or retiring peace officer, as specified. This bill would also exempt from the licensing requirement the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm if made by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government, to a licensed firearms dealer, a wholesaler, or a licensed manufacturer or importer of firearms or ammunition, if certain specified requirements are met. If the authorized law enforcement representative sells, delivers, or transfers a firearm to a licensed firearms dealer, the bill would require the governmental agency to enter a record of the delivery into the Automated Firearms Systems (AFS) via the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) within 10 days. (4) Existing law imposes various other restrictions on the sale, delivery, or transfer of firearms. Existing law excludes from those provisions the sale, delivery, or transfer of firearms made to an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government for exclusive use by that governmental agency, if certain conditions are met. Existing law provides that within 10 days of the date a firearm is acquired by the agency, a record shall be entered as an institutional weapon into the AFS via the CLETS. This bill would require an agency that subsequently destroys that weapon to enter information that the weapon has been destroyed into the AFS via the CLETS within 10 days of destruction. (5) Existing law provides that when neither party to a firearms transaction holds a dealer's license, the parties to the transaction are required to complete the sale, loan, or transfer of that firearm through a firearms dealer, except as specified. This bill would exclude from those provisions the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm if made by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government if certain specified conditions are met, including that the sale, delivery, or transfer is made to a wholesaler, or a licensed manufacturer, or importer of firearms or ammunition. The bill would require the agency to enter a record of the delivery into the AFS via the CLETS within 10 days. (6) Existing law requires the register or record of an electronic or telephonic transfer of a firearm to include specified information, including information on certain waiting period exemptions, including a dealer waiting period exemption, and requires the firearms dealer to record on the register or record the date that the firearm is delivered. A violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill instead would require the register or record to include any applicable waiting period exemption information. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the register or record to include a statement that the Department of Justice shall furnish the purchaser with any information reported to the department relating to the purchaser's ownership of the firearm, that the purchaser is entitled to file a report of his or her acquisition of the firearm, and of instructions for accessing the department's Internet Web site for more information. The bill would require the firearms dealer to record his or her signature indicating delivery of the firearm, and would require the purchaser to sign the register or record on the date that the firearm is delivered to the purchaser. (7) Existing law requires the purchaser of a firearm to present evidence to the dealer of the person's identity and age, and requires the transaction to be recorded by the dealer in a register or record of telephonic or electronic transfer. Existing law requires a dealer, upon request only, to provide a copy of the register or record of the transaction to the purchaser, and, for a private party transaction, requires the dealer, upon request, to provide the seller or purchaser with a copy of the register or record, as specified. This bill instead would require the dealer to provide a copy of those documents to the purchaser at the time of delivery of the firearm after the dealer notes the date of delivery and the dealer's signature indicating delivery of the firearm, and the dealer and purchaser acknowledge the receipt of the firearm. The bill, for private party transactions, would require the dealer to provide a copy of the register or record to the seller at the time that the register or record is signed by the seller. (8) Existing law prohibits a person from purchasing or receiving a handgun, except an antique firearm, without a valid handgun safety certificate, and further prohibits a person from selling, delivering, loaning, or transferring a handgun to a person who does not possess a valid handgun safety certificate, except as specified. This bill would exclude the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm by an authorized law enforcement representative of a city, county, city and county, or of the state or federal government if certain conditions are met, including that the sale, delivery, or transfer is made to one of specified persons and entities. (9) The bill would make conforming changes. (10) This bill would incorporate changes to Section 28160 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 683 that would become operative if this bill and SB 683 are both chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 538?
AB 538 is sponsored by Pan.
What is the current status of AB 538?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 538?
Track AB 538 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 538

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 538

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →