California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1391 — Insurance: omnibus.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 321, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires an entity seeking to be licensed as a risk retention group to be organized under California law and licensed as a liability insurance company. A risk retention group is a corporation, public entity, or other limited liability association that meets certain criteria, including that its primary activity consists of assuming and spreading all, or any portion, of the liability exposure of its group members. Existing law also exempts risk retention groups from the Business Transacted with Producer Controlled Insurer Act, which regulates controlled insurers, as prescribed. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2015, a risk retention group to comply with specified corporate governance requirements at the time of licensure, including that the board of directors have a majority of independent directors, as defined, that the term of any material service provider contract with a risk retention group not exceed 5 years, and that the risk retention group have an audit committee composed of at least 3 independent board members. The bill would also delete the risk retention group exemption from the Business Transacted with Producer Controlled Insurer Act. (2) Existing law provides that no cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy, not subject to certain cancellation protections because it has been in effect less than 60 days, is effective unless a notice of cancellation, subject to certain notice provisions, is mailed or delivered by the insurer to the named insured not later than the 59th day following the effective date and at least 10 days prior to the effective date of cancellation. Existing law also provides no notice of cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy, where the cancellation is based on, among other things, nonpayment of premium, is effective unless mailed or delivered by the insurer to the named insured, lienholder, or additional interest at least 20 days prior to the effective date of cancellation, except as specified. This bill would delete the requirements for cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy less than 60 days old, and would apply the requirements regarding notice of cancellation for nonpayment of premiums, and other specified reasons, to all cancellation circumstances. (3) Existing law defines the term "Adjusted RBC Report" as a Risk-Based Capital (RBC) report that has been adjusted by the Insurance Commissioner in accordance with specified provisions governing the determination of a property and casualty insurer's RBC. This bill would revise that definition to also include an RBC report that has been adjusted by the commissioner in accordance with specified provisions governing the determination of a life or health insurer's RBC. (4) Existing law provides for continuing education requirements, prior to license renewals, for specified insurance agents and broker-agents, including personal lines broker-agents and limited lines automobile insurance agents. This bill would require that those continuing education requirements include 3 hours of ethics. (5) Existing law requires every life agent who sells annuities to satisfactorily complete 8 hours of training prior to soliciting individual consumers, and requires every life agent who sells annuities to satisfactorily complete 4 hours of training prior to each license renewal. This bill would clarify the completion of an 8-hour training requirement to initially procure a license to sell annuities does not satisfy the requirement to complete a 4-hour training course in order to renew the annuity license. (6) Existing law prohibits the Insurance Commissioner from granting authority to transact variable contracts unless the life agent or applicant furnishes proof that he or she is registered to sell securities in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. This bill would make clear that the life agent or applicant is required to furnish proof that he or she is registered to sell securities in California in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. (7) Existing law requires an individual holding an insurance adjuster license, not otherwise exempt, to complete a minimum of 24 hours of continuing education courses, as specified. This bill would authorize an exemption from the continuing education requirements for an individual licensed as an insurance adjuster and as a property or casualty broker-agent who has met other specified continuing education requirements. (8) Existing law defines an insurance solicitor as a natural person employed to aid an insurance agent or insurance broker in transacting insurance other than life. This bill would redefine an insurance solicitor to mean a natural person employed to aid a property and casualty broker-agent acting as an insurance agent or insurance broker in transacting insurance other than life, disability, or health. (9) Existing law provides that a nonresident licensee who applies for a property broker-agent, casualty broker-agent, personal lines broker-agent, or life agent resident license in this state, and who is currently licensed for the same lines of authority in the state of his or her current resident license, is not required to complete an examination. The application for examination is required to be received within 90 days of the cancellation of the applicant's resident license and the producer database records, maintained by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, are required to indicate that the producer is licensed in good standing for the line of authority requested. This bill would provide that upon issuance of the California resident license, the examination waiver also applies to adding additional lines of authority to the California resident license provided that the individual was previously licensed in good standing for the requested additional lines of authority, and the application is received within 12 months of the cancellation of the applicant's previous resident license in another state. (10) Existing law regulates the sale of portable electronics insurance policies and requires all portable electronics vendors offering that insurance to be licensed, as specified. This bill would authorize an insurer to terminate or otherwise change the terms and conditions of a policy of portable electronics insurance, as provided. (11) Existing law requires the commissioner, after a public hearing held in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, to approve or issue a reasonable plan, or reasonable amendments to the plan, for the equitable apportionment, among insurers admitted to transact liability insurance, of those applicants for automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance who are in good faith entitled to, but are unable to procure, that insurance through ordinary methods. Existing law provides for judicial review of the proceedings held to revise automobile insurance rates. This bill would additionally require that the reasonable amendments to the plan be approved by the plan's advisory committee. The bill would delete the requirement that the public hearings be held in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, and provide, with exceptions, that the plan and any amendments not be subject to those provisions. The bill would instead require the commissioner to provide 45 days' notice of a public hearing by publishing the notice in the California Regulatory Notice Register, mailing the notice to the parties on the Department of Insurance's regulations mailing list, and posting the notice on the department's public Internet Web site. The bill would authorize interested parties to make oral or written comments and require the commissioner to consider all comments received before adopting any amendments to the plan, as provided. The bill would also provide for judicial review of a change to the plan. (12) Existing law authorizes an underwritten title company to engage in the business of preparing title searches, title reports, title examinations, or certificates or abstracts of title, upon the basis of which a title insurer writes title policies. Existing law authorizes any insurer, upon payment of the fees and costs and surrender to the commissioner of its certificate of authority, to apply to withdraw from this state, as provided. This bill would authorize underwritten title companies to apply to withdraw from the California insurance market. (13) This bill would make technical, conforming, and clarifying changes, and delete obsolete provisions. (14) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 10785 of the Insurance Code proposed by AB 1180, that would become operative only if AB 1180 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 321, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2694.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1943.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 26).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on INS.

  14. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  15. Referred to Com. on INS.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1345.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  19. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 1).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Read second time and amended.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 10).

  23. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  25. Referred to Com. on INS.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee April 4.

  27. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Insurance · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Insurance

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Republican 3000
Democratic 4000
Total 78000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chau — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 2001
Total 36003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Knight — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wright — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 64004
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 75004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chau — Yea
Conway — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Salas — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Brown — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Weber — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12000
Democratic 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Perea — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1391 do?
(1) Existing law requires an entity seeking to be licensed as a risk retention group to be organized under California law and licensed as a liability insurance company. A risk retention group is a corporation, public entity, or other limited liability association that meets certain criteria, including that its primary activity consists of assuming and spreading all, or any portion, of the liability exposure of its group members. Existing law also exempts risk retention groups from the Business Transacted with Producer Controlled Insurer Act, which regulates controlled insurers, as prescribed. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2015, a risk retention group to comply with specified corporate governance requirements at the time of licensure, including that the board of directors have a majority of independent directors, as defined, that the term of any material service provider contract with a risk retention group not exceed 5 years, and that the risk retention group have an audit committee composed of at least 3 independent board members. The bill would also delete the risk retention group exemption from the Business Transacted with Producer Controlled Insurer Act. (2) Existing law provides that no cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy, not subject to certain cancellation protections because it has been in effect less than 60 days, is effective unless a notice of cancellation, subject to certain notice provisions, is mailed or delivered by the insurer to the named insured not later than the 59th day following the effective date and at least 10 days prior to the effective date of cancellation. Existing law also provides no notice of cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy, where the cancellation is based on, among other things, nonpayment of premium, is effective unless mailed or delivered by the insurer to the named insured, lienholder, or additional interest at least 20 days prior to the effective date of cancellation, except as specified. This bill would delete the requirements for cancellation of a motor vehicle insurance policy less than 60 days old, and would apply the requirements regarding notice of cancellation for nonpayment of premiums, and other specified reasons, to all cancellation circumstances. (3) Existing law defines the term "Adjusted RBC Report" as a Risk-Based Capital (RBC) report that has been adjusted by the Insurance Commissioner in accordance with specified provisions governing the determination of a property and casualty insurer's RBC. This bill would revise that definition to also include an RBC report that has been adjusted by the commissioner in accordance with specified provisions governing the determination of a life or health insurer's RBC. (4) Existing law provides for continuing education requirements, prior to license renewals, for specified insurance agents and broker-agents, including personal lines broker-agents and limited lines automobile insurance agents. This bill would require that those continuing education requirements include 3 hours of ethics. (5) Existing law requires every life agent who sells annuities to satisfactorily complete 8 hours of training prior to soliciting individual consumers, and requires every life agent who sells annuities to satisfactorily complete 4 hours of training prior to each license renewal. This bill would clarify the completion of an 8-hour training requirement to initially procure a license to sell annuities does not satisfy the requirement to complete a 4-hour training course in order to renew the annuity license. (6) Existing law prohibits the Insurance Commissioner from granting authority to transact variable contracts unless the life agent or applicant furnishes proof that he or she is registered to sell securities in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. This bill would make clear that the life agent or applicant is required to furnish proof that he or she is registered to sell securities in California in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. (7) Existing law requires an individual holding an insurance adjuster license, not otherwise exempt, to complete a minimum of 24 hours of continuing education courses, as specified. This bill would authorize an exemption from the continuing education requirements for an individual licensed as an insurance adjuster and as a property or casualty broker-agent who has met other specified continuing education requirements. (8) Existing law defines an insurance solicitor as a natural person employed to aid an insurance agent or insurance broker in transacting insurance other than life. This bill would redefine an insurance solicitor to mean a natural person employed to aid a property and casualty broker-agent acting as an insurance agent or insurance broker in transacting insurance other than life, disability, or health. (9) Existing law provides that a nonresident licensee who applies for a property broker-agent, casualty broker-agent, personal lines broker-agent, or life agent resident license in this state, and who is currently licensed for the same lines of authority in the state of his or her current resident license, is not required to complete an examination. The application for examination is required to be received within 90 days of the cancellation of the applicant's resident license and the producer database records, maintained by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, are required to indicate that the producer is licensed in good standing for the line of authority requested. This bill would provide that upon issuance of the California resident license, the examination waiver also applies to adding additional lines of authority to the California resident license provided that the individual was previously licensed in good standing for the requested additional lines of authority, and the application is received within 12 months of the cancellation of the applicant's previous resident license in another state. (10) Existing law regulates the sale of portable electronics insurance policies and requires all portable electronics vendors offering that insurance to be licensed, as specified. This bill would authorize an insurer to terminate or otherwise change the terms and conditions of a policy of portable electronics insurance, as provided. (11) Existing law requires the commissioner, after a public hearing held in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, to approve or issue a reasonable plan, or reasonable amendments to the plan, for the equitable apportionment, among insurers admitted to transact liability insurance, of those applicants for automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance who are in good faith entitled to, but are unable to procure, that insurance through ordinary methods. Existing law provides for judicial review of the proceedings held to revise automobile insurance rates. This bill would additionally require that the reasonable amendments to the plan be approved by the plan's advisory committee. The bill would delete the requirement that the public hearings be held in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, and provide, with exceptions, that the plan and any amendments not be subject to those provisions. The bill would instead require the commissioner to provide 45 days' notice of a public hearing by publishing the notice in the California Regulatory Notice Register, mailing the notice to the parties on the Department of Insurance's regulations mailing list, and posting the notice on the department's public Internet Web site. The bill would authorize interested parties to make oral or written comments and require the commissioner to consider all comments received before adopting any amendments to the plan, as provided. The bill would also provide for judicial review of a change to the plan. (12) Existing law authorizes an underwritten title company to engage in the business of preparing title searches, title reports, title examinations, or certificates or abstracts of title, upon the basis of which a title insurer writes title policies. Existing law authorizes any insurer, upon payment of the fees and costs and surrender to the commissioner of its certificate of authority, to apply to withdraw from this state, as provided. This bill would authorize underwritten title companies to apply to withdraw from the California insurance market. (13) This bill would make technical, conforming, and clarifying changes, and delete obsolete provisions. (14) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 10785 of the Insurance Code proposed by AB 1180, that would become operative only if AB 1180 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 1391?
AB 1391 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
What is the current status of AB 1391?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1391?
Track AB 1391 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1391

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1391

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →