California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1299 — Telecommunications: universal service programs: California Advanced Services Fund.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 507, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. The act authorizes each state to adopt regulations to provide for additional definitions and standards to preserve and advance universal service within the state, only to the extent that they adopt additional specific, predictable, and sufficient mechanisms that do not rely on or burden federal universal service support mechanisms. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. Existing law establishes the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) in the State Treasury and requires that moneys in those funds are the proceeds of rates and are held in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate telephone corporations for their costs of providing universal service and may be expended only to accomplish specified telecommunications universal service programs, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental appropriation. Existing law requires the commission to develop, implement, and administer the CASF to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians that will promote economic growth, job creation, and substantial social benefits of advanced information and communications technologies, as provided in specified decisions of the commission and in the CASF statute. Existing law establishes 3 accounts, the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account, the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account, and the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account within the CASF. Existing law prohibits the commission from collecting, before January 1, 2011, more than $100,000,000, for deposit into the CASF through a specified surcharge authorized by the commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to collect an additional sum not to exceed $125,000,000, after January 1, 2011, for a sum total of moneys collected through the surcharge not to exceed $225,000,000. Existing law authorizes the commission to collect the additional sum through the 2015 calendar year. Existing law requires that of the moneys collected after January 1, 2011, $100,000,000 is to be deposited into the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account, $10,000,000 is to be deposited into the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account and used for specified purposes, and $15,000,000 is to be deposited into the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account and used for specified purposes. This bill would establish the Broadband Public Housing Account within the CASF and would authorize the commission to transfer $20,000,000 from the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account and $5,000,000 from the Broadband Revolving Loan Account to the Broadband Public Housing Account if the commission is otherwise authorized to collect funds for purposes of the CASF in excess of the $225,000,000 the commission is authorized to collect through December 31, 2015, under existing law. The bill would authorize not more than $20,000,000 from the Broadband Public Housing Account be available for grants and loans to a publicly supported community, as defined, to finance a project to connect a broadband network to that publicly supported community. The bill would authorize not more than $5,000,000 from the Broadband Public Housing Account be available for grants and loans to a publicly supported community to support programs designed to increase adoption rates for broadband services for residents of that publicly supported community. The bill would require the commission, in reviewing a project application to consider the availability of other funding sources for that project, any financial contribution from the broadband service provider to the project, the availability of any other public or private broadband adoption or deployment program, including tax credits and other incentives, and whether the applicant has sought funding from, or participated in, any reasonably available program. The bill would authorize the commission to require an applicant to provide match funding, and prohibit the commission from denying funding for a project solely because the applicant is receiving funding from another source. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 281 of the Public Utilities Code proposed in SB 740, that would become operative only if SB 740 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. The provisions of the bill would become operative only if this bill and SB 740 of the 2013–14 Regular Session are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2014.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 507, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 18. Page 3304.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 2356.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).

  11. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (July 2).

  14. Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 1707.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) .

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.

  23. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Referred to Com. on U. & C.

  26. Read first time.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.

  28. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bradford · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Bradford

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 55 Yea · 18 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 511505
Democratic 4000
Republican 0300
Total 551805
% of votes cast 71%23%0%6%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Not Voting
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Levine — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Linder — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Medina — Yea
Allen — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Holden — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Passed 26 Yea · 11 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231102
Democratic 3000
Total 261102
% of votes cast 67%28%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wright — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 0001
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
De León — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7201
Democratic 1000
Total 8201
% of votes cast 73%18%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Wright — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Corbett — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Passed 58 Yea · 17 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 511304
Democratic 6100
Republican 1300
Total 581704
% of votes cast 73%22%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Stone — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Salas — Yea
Logue — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12400
Democratic 1000
Total 13400
% of votes cast 76%24%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Linder — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Passed 13 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10100
Republican 1001
Democratic 2000
Total 13101
% of votes cast 87%7%0%7%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1299 do?
Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. The act authorizes each state to adopt regulations to provide for additional definitions and standards to preserve and advance universal service within the state, only to the extent that they adopt additional specific, predictable, and sufficient mechanisms that do not rely on or burden federal universal service support mechanisms. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. Existing law establishes the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) in the State Treasury and requires that moneys in those funds are the proceeds of rates and are held in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate telephone corporations for their costs of providing universal service and may be expended only to accomplish specified telecommunications universal service programs, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental appropriation. Existing law requires the commission to develop, implement, and administer the CASF to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians that will promote economic growth, job creation, and substantial social benefits of advanced information and communications technologies, as provided in specified decisions of the commission and in the CASF statute. Existing law establishes 3 accounts, the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account, the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account, and the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account within the CASF. Existing law prohibits the commission from collecting, before January 1, 2011, more than $100,000,000, for deposit into the CASF through a specified surcharge authorized by the commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to collect an additional sum not to exceed $125,000,000, after January 1, 2011, for a sum total of moneys collected through the surcharge not to exceed $225,000,000. Existing law authorizes the commission to collect the additional sum through the 2015 calendar year. Existing law requires that of the moneys collected after January 1, 2011, $100,000,000 is to be deposited into the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account, $10,000,000 is to be deposited into the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account and used for specified purposes, and $15,000,000 is to be deposited into the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account and used for specified purposes. This bill would establish the Broadband Public Housing Account within the CASF and would authorize the commission to transfer $20,000,000 from the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account and $5,000,000 from the Broadband Revolving Loan Account to the Broadband Public Housing Account if the commission is otherwise authorized to collect funds for purposes of the CASF in excess of the $225,000,000 the commission is authorized to collect through December 31, 2015, under existing law. The bill would authorize not more than $20,000,000 from the Broadband Public Housing Account be available for grants and loans to a publicly supported community, as defined, to finance a project to connect a broadband network to that publicly supported community. The bill would authorize not more than $5,000,000 from the Broadband Public Housing Account be available for grants and loans to a publicly supported community to support programs designed to increase adoption rates for broadband services for residents of that publicly supported community. The bill would require the commission, in reviewing a project application to consider the availability of other funding sources for that project, any financial contribution from the broadband service provider to the project, the availability of any other public or private broadband adoption or deployment program, including tax credits and other incentives, and whether the applicant has sought funding from, or participated in, any reasonably available program. The bill would authorize the commission to require an applicant to provide match funding, and prohibit the commission from denying funding for a project solely because the applicant is receiving funding from another source. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 281 of the Public Utilities Code proposed in SB 740, that would become operative only if SB 740 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, and this bill is chaptered last. The provisions of the bill would become operative only if this bill and SB 740 of the 2013–14 Regular Session are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2014.
Who sponsors AB 1299?
AB 1299 is sponsored by Bradford.
What is the current status of AB 1299?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1299?
Track AB 1299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1299

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1299

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →