Greenway Development and Sustainment Act.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1922 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1922.
You're tracking AB 1922
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1922 — Greenway Development and Sustainment Act.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes various plans and programs intended to preserve, protect, and rehabilitate lands adjacent to rivers in the state. This bill would enact the Greenway Development and Sustainment Act, which is intended to promote the development of greenways along urban rivers in the state, including the development of a greenway along the Los Angeles River and its tributaries. The bill would define the term "greenway" for purposes of the bill as a nonmotorized vehicle transportation and recreational travel corridor that meets specified requirements and would include greenways in the definition of "open-space land" for local planning purposes. Existing law authorizes certain entities and organizations to acquire and hold conservation easements, including a tax exempt nonprofit organization qualified to do business in this state that has as its primary purpose the preservation, protection, or enhancement of land in its natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, forested, or open-space condition or use. This bill would also authorize such a tax exempt nonprofit organization to acquire and hold a conservation easement if the organization has as its primary purpose the development of a greenway.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/18/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 18, 2014
- Amended 05/13/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 13, 2014
- Amended 05/01/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 01, 2014
- Amended 03/20/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 20, 2014
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2014
- AB1922 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 5004.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (May 7).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gomez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gomez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 58 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 22% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 20% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1922 do?
- Existing law establishes various plans and programs intended to preserve, protect, and rehabilitate lands adjacent to rivers in the state. This bill would enact the Greenway Development and Sustainment Act, which is intended to promote the development of greenways along urban rivers in the state, including the development of a greenway along the Los Angeles River and its tributaries. The bill would define the term "greenway" for purposes of the bill as a nonmotorized vehicle transportation and recreational travel corridor that meets specified requirements and would include greenways in the definition of "open-space land" for local planning purposes. Existing law authorizes certain entities and organizations to acquire and hold conservation easements, including a tax exempt nonprofit organization qualified to do business in this state that has as its primary purpose the preservation, protection, or enhancement of land in its natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, forested, or open-space condition or use. This bill would also authorize such a tax exempt nonprofit organization to acquire and hold a conservation easement if the organization has as its primary purpose the development of a greenway.
- Who sponsors AB 1922?
- AB 1922 is sponsored by Gomez.
- What is the current status of AB 1922?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1922?
- Track AB 1922 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1922
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1922
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →