Fish: accounting records: violation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 764 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 764.
You're tracking SB 764
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 764 — Fish: accounting records: violation.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires commercial licensed fishermen and any person who deals in fresh or frozen fish for profit to keep prescribed accounting records. Existing law requires any of this accounting record information that is transmitted to any business that deals in fish for profit to be in the English language. Under existing law, a violation of any provision of the Fish and Game Code, or any rule, regulation, or order made or adopted under those provisions, is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would require a commercial licensed fisherman and any person who deals in fresh or frozen fish for profit to transmit the prescribed accounting record information, as further specified, to any business that deals in fish for profit. The bill would permit the accounting record information to be provided in one or more additional languages. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/15/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf January 15, 2014
- Amended 01/09/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 09, 2014
- Amended 01/06/14 - Amended Senate pdf January 06, 2014
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB764 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Died at Desk.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 2637.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing January 21.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 2590.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing January 14.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Yee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Yee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 764 do?
- Existing law requires commercial licensed fishermen and any person who deals in fresh or frozen fish for profit to keep prescribed accounting records. Existing law requires any of this accounting record information that is transmitted to any business that deals in fish for profit to be in the English language. Under existing law, a violation of any provision of the Fish and Game Code, or any rule, regulation, or order made or adopted under those provisions, is a misdemeanor, unless otherwise specified. This bill would require a commercial licensed fisherman and any person who deals in fresh or frozen fish for profit to transmit the prescribed accounting record information, as further specified, to any business that deals in fish for profit. The bill would permit the accounting record information to be provided in one or more additional languages. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 764?
- SB 764 is sponsored by Yee.
- What is the current status of SB 764?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 764?
- Track SB 764 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 764
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 764
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →