California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2276 — Pupils: transfers from juvenile court schools.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 901, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law affords various protections for the enrollment of pupils in foster care, as defined, in schools, including, among others, expedited enrollment and speedy transfer of academic records when a pupil in foster care is transferring schools. Existing law also provides for the administration and operation of juvenile court schools by county offices of education, and sets forth separate protections specifically applicable to pupils who have had contact with the juvenile justice system, including prohibiting a pupil from being denied enrollment or readmission to a public school because he or she has had contact with the juvenile justice system. This bill would require a pupil who has had contact with the juvenile justice system to be immediately enrolled in a public school, in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would require a county office of education and county probation department to have a joint transition planning policy that includes collaboration with relevant local educational agencies relating to pupils who are being released from juvenile court schools. By imposing additional requirements on local governmental entities with respect to the collaboration between a county office of education, the county probation department, and other relevant local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would strongly encourage local educational agencies to enter into memoranda of understanding and create joint policies, as specified, regarding the immediate transfer of educational records and enrollment of pupils transferring from juvenile court schools. The bill, subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act, would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction, in consultation with the Board of State and Community Corrections, to convene a statewide group to develop a model and study programs and policies relating to the transfer of educational records and enrollment of pupils who are being transferred from juvenile court schools, and would require the statewide group to report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature and appropriate policy committees on or before January 1, 2016. The bill would revise legislative findings and declarations regarding the transfer of pupils in foster care who have had contact with the juvenile justice system, and would make other clarifying and conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 901, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6354.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6347.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 23 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4709.).

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 14).

  10. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

  13. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Referred to Com. on ED.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5186.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 23).

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Com. on ED.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  31. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bocanegra · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Bocanegra

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2276 BOCANEGRA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69003
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 76003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fong — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB2276 Bocanegra By Lara

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Democratic 2001
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Hill — Yea
Monning — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Democratic 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2276 BOCANEGRA Assembly Third Reading

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71001
Democratic 3001
Republican 3000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Gray — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Linder — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2276 do?
Existing law affords various protections for the enrollment of pupils in foster care, as defined, in schools, including, among others, expedited enrollment and speedy transfer of academic records when a pupil in foster care is transferring schools. Existing law also provides for the administration and operation of juvenile court schools by county offices of education, and sets forth separate protections specifically applicable to pupils who have had contact with the juvenile justice system, including prohibiting a pupil from being denied enrollment or readmission to a public school because he or she has had contact with the juvenile justice system. This bill would require a pupil who has had contact with the juvenile justice system to be immediately enrolled in a public school, in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would require a county office of education and county probation department to have a joint transition planning policy that includes collaboration with relevant local educational agencies relating to pupils who are being released from juvenile court schools. By imposing additional requirements on local governmental entities with respect to the collaboration between a county office of education, the county probation department, and other relevant local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would strongly encourage local educational agencies to enter into memoranda of understanding and create joint policies, as specified, regarding the immediate transfer of educational records and enrollment of pupils transferring from juvenile court schools. The bill, subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act, would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction, in consultation with the Board of State and Community Corrections, to convene a statewide group to develop a model and study programs and policies relating to the transfer of educational records and enrollment of pupils who are being transferred from juvenile court schools, and would require the statewide group to report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature and appropriate policy committees on or before January 1, 2016. The bill would revise legislative findings and declarations regarding the transfer of pupils in foster care who have had contact with the juvenile justice system, and would make other clarifying and conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 2276?
AB 2276 is sponsored by Bocanegra.
What is the current status of AB 2276?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2276?
Track AB 2276 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2276

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2276

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →