Department of Motor Vehicles: records: confidentiality.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 767 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 767.
You're tracking SB 767
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 767 — Department of Motor Vehicles: records: confidentiality.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of certain public employees and officials that appear in any records of the Department of Motor Vehicles, except to a court, a law enforcement agency, an attorney in a civil or criminal action under certain circumstances, and certain other official entities. This bill would extend that prohibition, subject to those same exceptions, to the disclosure of the home addresses of code enforcement officers, as defined. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/27/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 27, 2014
- Amended 07/03/13 - Amended Assembly pdf July 03, 2013
- Amended 04/04/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 04, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB767 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 2550.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1157.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1020.) (May 23).
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 751.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Lieu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lieu
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 22% | 22% | 0% | 56% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 18% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 767 do?
- Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of certain public employees and officials that appear in any records of the Department of Motor Vehicles, except to a court, a law enforcement agency, an attorney in a civil or criminal action under certain circumstances, and certain other official entities. This bill would extend that prohibition, subject to those same exceptions, to the disclosure of the home addresses of code enforcement officers, as defined. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
- Who sponsors SB 767?
- SB 767 is sponsored by Lieu.
- What is the current status of SB 767?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 767?
- Track SB 767 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 767
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 767
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →