California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 82 — Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 34, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (authority) to make loans from the continuously appropriated California Health Facilities Financing Authority Fund to participating health institutions for financing or refinancing the acquisition, construction, or remodeling of health facilities. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the continuously appropriated Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act, as originally enacted, limited state administrative costs to implement duties pursuant to the programs to 5% of the total of annual revenues received for the fund. Existing law limits state administrative costs to 3.5%. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (commission) to oversee the administration of various parts of the Mental Health Services Act. The act provides that it may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of each house as long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act, and that the Legislature may also clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would restore the limit on state administrative costs to 5%. This bill would establish the Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the authority for the purposes of the act be made available to selected counties or counties acting jointly, except as otherwise provided, and used to increase capacity for client assistance and services in crisis intervention, crisis stabilization, crisis residential treatment, rehabilitative mental health services, and mobile crisis support teams. The bill would require the authority to develop and to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, as prescribed. The bill would require the authority to provide prescribed reports to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature on May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the commission for the purposes of the act be allocated to selected counties, counties acting jointly, or city mental health departments, as determined by the commission through a selection process, for triage personnel to provide intensive case management and linkage to services for individuals with mental health disorders. The bill would authorize triage personnel to provide targeted case management services face to face, by telephone, or by telehealth. The bill would require the commission to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, and require the commission to provide a prescribed report to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2014. The bill would prohibit funds awarded by the authority or commission from being used to supplant existing financial and resource commitments of the grantee. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the California Health Facilities Financing Authority for these purposes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 34, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 1374.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 59. Noes 20. Page 1988.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 1983.)

  9. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  10. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 894.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Ordered to second reading.

  15. Withdrawn from committee.

  16. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  18. (Corrected May 9).

  19. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 82 B. & F. R. Senate Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 59 Yea · 20 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 531500
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 592000
% of votes cast 75%25%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Daly — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Logue — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Conway — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Unfinished Supp 2 SB82 Committee on B. & F.R. (Leno) Concurrence

Passed 36 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33102
Democratic 3000
Total 36102
% of votes cast 92%3%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Torres — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lara — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB82 Committee on B. & F.R.

Passed 24 Yea · 9 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22904
Democratic 2001
Total 24905
% of votes cast 63%24%0%13%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Roth — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Not Voting
Price — Not Voting
Walters — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 82 do?
The California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (authority) to make loans from the continuously appropriated California Health Facilities Financing Authority Fund to participating health institutions for financing or refinancing the acquisition, construction, or remodeling of health facilities. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the continuously appropriated Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act, as originally enacted, limited state administrative costs to implement duties pursuant to the programs to 5% of the total of annual revenues received for the fund. Existing law limits state administrative costs to 3.5%. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (commission) to oversee the administration of various parts of the Mental Health Services Act. The act provides that it may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of each house as long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act, and that the Legislature may also clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would restore the limit on state administrative costs to 5%. This bill would establish the Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the authority for the purposes of the act be made available to selected counties or counties acting jointly, except as otherwise provided, and used to increase capacity for client assistance and services in crisis intervention, crisis stabilization, crisis residential treatment, rehabilitative mental health services, and mobile crisis support teams. The bill would require the authority to develop and to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, as prescribed. The bill would require the authority to provide prescribed reports to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature on May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the commission for the purposes of the act be allocated to selected counties, counties acting jointly, or city mental health departments, as determined by the commission through a selection process, for triage personnel to provide intensive case management and linkage to services for individuals with mental health disorders. The bill would authorize triage personnel to provide targeted case management services face to face, by telephone, or by telehealth. The bill would require the commission to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, and require the commission to provide a prescribed report to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2014. The bill would prohibit funds awarded by the authority or commission from being used to supplant existing financial and resource commitments of the grantee. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the California Health Facilities Financing Authority for these purposes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 82?
SB 82 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 82?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 82?
Track SB 82 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 82

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 82

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →