California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1154 — Peace officers: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 559, Statutes of 2014.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department is a peace officer if the primary duty of the peace officer is the enforcement of the law in or about the properties of the district. Existing law requires every law enforcement agency in the state to develop, adopt, and implement written policies and standards for officers' responses to domestic violence calls that encourage the arrest of domestic violence offenders if there is probable cause that an offense has been committed. Existing law defines "officer" for these purposes. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department in the definition of "officer" for the purposes of these provisions. By increasing the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Under existing law, a person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, is guilty of the crime of stalking. Existing law allows a judicial officer to issue an ex parte emergency protective order if a peace officer, as defined, asserts reasonable grounds to believe that a person is in immediate and present danger of stalking, as provided. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department in the definition of peace officer for the purposes of these provisions. (3) Existing law requires certain specified peace officers to take temporary custody of any firearm or other deadly weapon discovered at the scene of a domestic violence incident involving a threat to human life or physical assault or if the peace officer is serving a protective order. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department among the peace officers to whom these provisions apply. By increasing the duties of local peace officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes the Sacramento Regional Transit District, the Fresno Area Express, and, until January 1, 2015, the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, to issue a prohibition order to a person who has been cited on at least 3 separate occasions, within a period of 90 days, for specified infractions committed in or on a vehicle, bus stop, or train or light rail station of the transit district. This bill would authorize the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District to issue a prohibition order pursuant to the above provisions until January 1, 2018. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 18250 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 1014, to be operative only if AB 1014 and this bill are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is enacted last. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 559, Statutes of 2014.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4717.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5969.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Page 5912.)

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From consent calendar.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  12. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (July 2).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  15. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3359.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3277.) (April 28).

  20. Set for hearing April 28.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3019.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  23. Set for hearing April 1.

  24. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  25. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  26. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Anderson · Cosponsor
  • Hancock · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hancock

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Anderson

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB1154 Hancock Concurrence

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democratic 2001
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Not Voting
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 1154 Hancock Senate Third Reading By SKINNER

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 72000
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 79000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Gray — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Democratic 2001
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Block — Yea
Leno — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Democratic 0001
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1154 do?
(1) Under existing law, a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department is a peace officer if the primary duty of the peace officer is the enforcement of the law in or about the properties of the district. Existing law requires every law enforcement agency in the state to develop, adopt, and implement written policies and standards for officers' responses to domestic violence calls that encourage the arrest of domestic violence offenders if there is probable cause that an offense has been committed. Existing law defines "officer" for these purposes. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department in the definition of "officer" for the purposes of these provisions. By increasing the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Under existing law, a person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, is guilty of the crime of stalking. Existing law allows a judicial officer to issue an ex parte emergency protective order if a peace officer, as defined, asserts reasonable grounds to believe that a person is in immediate and present danger of stalking, as provided. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department in the definition of peace officer for the purposes of these provisions. (3) Existing law requires certain specified peace officers to take temporary custody of any firearm or other deadly weapon discovered at the scene of a domestic violence incident involving a threat to human life or physical assault or if the peace officer is serving a protective order. This bill would include a member of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Police Department among the peace officers to whom these provisions apply. By increasing the duties of local peace officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes the Sacramento Regional Transit District, the Fresno Area Express, and, until January 1, 2015, the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, to issue a prohibition order to a person who has been cited on at least 3 separate occasions, within a period of 90 days, for specified infractions committed in or on a vehicle, bus stop, or train or light rail station of the transit district. This bill would authorize the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District to issue a prohibition order pursuant to the above provisions until January 1, 2018. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 18250 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 1014, to be operative only if AB 1014 and this bill are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is enacted last. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 1154?
SB 1154 is sponsored by Anderson and Hancock.
What is the current status of SB 1154?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1154?
Track SB 1154 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1154

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1154

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →