Criminal procedure: testimony of law enforcement officers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 568 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 568.
You're tracking AB 568
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 568 — Criminal procedure: testimony of law enforcement officers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 125, Statutes of 2013.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, as amended by Proposition 115, approved by the voters at the June 5, 1990, statewide primary election, authorizes a finding of probable cause to be based in whole or in part upon the sworn testimony of a law enforcement officer or honorably retired law enforcement officer relating the statements of declarants made out of court offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Under existing law that officer is required to have 5 years law enforcement experience or completed specified training. Existing law provides for amendment of these provisions by a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature. This bill would define a law enforcement officer, for purposes of these provisions, as any officer or agent employed by a federal, state, or local government agency who, in addition to that experience or training, has primary responsibility of the enforcement of any law, the detection and apprehension of persons who have violated any law, or the investigation and preparation for prosecution of cases involving violation of laws.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/19/13 - Chaptered Current pdf August 19, 2013
- Enrolled 08/08/13 - Enrolled pdf August 08, 2013
- Introduced 02/20/13 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2013
- AB568 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 125, Statutes of 2013.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:40 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1687.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1508.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Al Muratsuchi · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 568 do?
- Existing law, as amended by Proposition 115, approved by the voters at the June 5, 1990, statewide primary election, authorizes a finding of probable cause to be based in whole or in part upon the sworn testimony of a law enforcement officer or honorably retired law enforcement officer relating the statements of declarants made out of court offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Under existing law that officer is required to have 5 years law enforcement experience or completed specified training. Existing law provides for amendment of these provisions by a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature. This bill would define a law enforcement officer, for purposes of these provisions, as any officer or agent employed by a federal, state, or local government agency who, in addition to that experience or training, has primary responsibility of the enforcement of any law, the detection and apprehension of persons who have violated any law, or the investigation and preparation for prosecution of cases involving violation of laws.
- Who sponsors AB 568?
- AB 568 is sponsored by Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 568?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 568?
- Track AB 568 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 568
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 568
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →