Career technical education: funding.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 660 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 660.
You're tracking SB 660
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 660 — Career technical education: funding.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides funding for various career technical education programs, including regional occupational centers and programs, specialized secondary programs, partnership academies, and agricultural career technical education programs. This bill would require county superintendents of schools and school districts, subject to existing expenditure requirements for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 fiscal years for the purpose of regional occupational centers or programs, to comply with specified requirements, including, among others, certifying to the State Department of Education that each course within a sequence is aligned with the California Career Technical Education Standards and, where appropriate, the Common Core State Standards. The bill would require the Superintendent to incorporate various factors and quality indicators into the accountability measures for regional occupational centers and programs, and would require the Superintendent to develop an evaluation instrument to evaluate the programs within each county office of education and school district commencing with the 2014–15 school year. By imposing new requirements on specified county superintendents of schools and school districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/07/13 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 07, 2013
- Amended 05/24/13 - Amended Senate pdf May 24, 2013
- Amended 04/24/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 24, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB660 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
(Corrected August 16).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 1161.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1018.) (May 23).
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 787.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing May 1.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 10.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hancock · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hancock
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 5% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 660 do?
- Existing law provides funding for various career technical education programs, including regional occupational centers and programs, specialized secondary programs, partnership academies, and agricultural career technical education programs. This bill would require county superintendents of schools and school districts, subject to existing expenditure requirements for the 2013–14 and 2014–15 fiscal years for the purpose of regional occupational centers or programs, to comply with specified requirements, including, among others, certifying to the State Department of Education that each course within a sequence is aligned with the California Career Technical Education Standards and, where appropriate, the Common Core State Standards. The bill would require the Superintendent to incorporate various factors and quality indicators into the accountability measures for regional occupational centers and programs, and would require the Superintendent to develop an evaluation instrument to evaluate the programs within each county office of education and school district commencing with the 2014–15 school year. By imposing new requirements on specified county superintendents of schools and school districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 660?
- SB 660 is sponsored by Hancock.
- What is the current status of SB 660?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 660?
- Track SB 660 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 660
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 660
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →