AB 2192 — Housing: building permits.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the building department of every city or county is required to enforce the provisions of the State Building Standards Code, the State Housing Law, and the other rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to that law pertaining to, among other things, the erection, construction, reconstruction, or repair of apartment houses, hotels, or dwellings. Existing law permits the governing body of a local agency to authorize its enforcement agency to contract with or employ a private entity or persons on a temporary basis to perform the plan-checking function. Existing law, when there is excessive delay in checking plans and specifications submitted as part of an application for a residential building permit, requires the local agency, upon the applicant's request, to contract with or employ a private entity or persons temporarily to perform the plan-checking function, as specified. This bill would establish a 5-year pilot project in 3 unspecified local agencies that would permit the governing body of a local agency to authorize a building department to create and implement a program whereby a building permit may be issued upon submission of plans prepared by an architect and reviewed by another unaffiliated architect, for specified types of projects.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/23/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 23, 2014
- Introduced 02/20/14 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2014
- AB2192 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 4. Page 5225.)
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5096.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Melendez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Melendez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 5% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2192 do?
- Under existing law, the building department of every city or county is required to enforce the provisions of the State Building Standards Code, the State Housing Law, and the other rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to that law pertaining to, among other things, the erection, construction, reconstruction, or repair of apartment houses, hotels, or dwellings. Existing law permits the governing body of a local agency to authorize its enforcement agency to contract with or employ a private entity or persons on a temporary basis to perform the plan-checking function. Existing law, when there is excessive delay in checking plans and specifications submitted as part of an application for a residential building permit, requires the local agency, upon the applicant's request, to contract with or employ a private entity or persons temporarily to perform the plan-checking function, as specified. This bill would establish a 5-year pilot project in 3 unspecified local agencies that would permit the governing body of a local agency to authorize a building department to create and implement a program whereby a building permit may be issued upon submission of plans prepared by an architect and reviewed by another unaffiliated architect, for specified types of projects.
- Who sponsors AB 2192?
- AB 2192 is sponsored by Melendez.
- What is the current status of AB 2192?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2192?
- Track AB 2192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →