California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 701 — General Subject: Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments: County of Orange.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 393, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. For the 2004–05 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to each county's Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for the benefit of educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions by increasing the vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the County of Orange by $53,000,000 for the 2013–14 fiscal year and requiring that amount to be included in the calculation of the vehicle license fee adjustment amount for that county for each fiscal year thereafter. This bill would direct the Department of Finance and the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to work with the County of Orange, the county auditor-controller for the County of Orange, and intervenors in obtaining a final and complete resolution to a specified case in which all parties agree not to seek appellate review. The bill would include findings and declarations that an appropriate resolution would be for the County of Orange to repay specified amounts over a specified period. By changing the manner in which property tax revenues are allocated by the county officials in the County of Orange, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, for the 2009–10 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, requires the auditor of a qualified county, as defined, to increase the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to that county by the county equity amount, as defined, and to commensurately reduce the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in the county, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Orange. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 393, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3309.).

  5. From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (September 11).

  6. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 3247.)

  7. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2354.).

  10. Taken up without reference to file by unanimous consent.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 11).

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Measure version as amended on September 4 corrected.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).

  16. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended. (Page 2190.)

  17. Joint Rule 61(a) suspended. (Page 2190.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  27. Withdrawn from committee.

  28. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and RLS.

  29. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  30. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1042.)

  31. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  32. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 17).

  33. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  34. Referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E.

  35. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  36. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Correa · Cosponsor
  • Daly · Cosponsor
  • Hagman · Cosponsor
  • Harkey · Cosponsor
  • Huff · Cosponsor
  • Mansoor · Cosponsor
  • Sharon Quirk-Silva · Primary
  • Wagner · Cosponsor
  • Walters · Cosponsor
  • Wyland · Cosponsor
  • Travis Allen · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

  • Correa
  • Daly
  • Hagman
  • Harkey
  • Huff
  • Mansoor
  • Wagner
  • Walters
  • Wyland
  • Travis Allen

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 701 QUIRK-SILVA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70001
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 77001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fox — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Olsen — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

amendments be concurred in.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Melendez — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Gordon — Yea

Official roll call →

W/O REF. TO FILE AB701 Quirk-Silva By Correa

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 3000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wright — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
De León — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 701 PÉREZ, J. Assembly Third Reading

Passed 54 Yea · 24 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 481901
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 542401
% of votes cast 68%30%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Daly — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chau — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Torres — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Hall — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 701 do?
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. For the 2004–05 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to each county's Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for the benefit of educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions by increasing the vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the County of Orange by $53,000,000 for the 2013–14 fiscal year and requiring that amount to be included in the calculation of the vehicle license fee adjustment amount for that county for each fiscal year thereafter. This bill would direct the Department of Finance and the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to work with the County of Orange, the county auditor-controller for the County of Orange, and intervenors in obtaining a final and complete resolution to a specified case in which all parties agree not to seek appellate review. The bill would include findings and declarations that an appropriate resolution would be for the County of Orange to repay specified amounts over a specified period. By changing the manner in which property tax revenues are allocated by the county officials in the County of Orange, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, for the 2009–10 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, requires the auditor of a qualified county, as defined, to increase the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to that county by the county equity amount, as defined, and to commensurately reduce the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue otherwise required to be allocated to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in the county, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Orange. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 701?
AB 701 is sponsored by Correa, Daly, Hagman, Harkey, Huff, Mansoor, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Wagner, Walters, Wyland, and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 701?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 701?
Track AB 701 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 701

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 701

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →