Medi-Cal: nondesignated public hospitals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 468 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 468.
You're tracking AB 468
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 468 — Medi-Cal: nondesignated public hospitals.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to seek a successor demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that beginning with services provided on or after July 1, 2013, to the extent that additional federal funding is made available pursuant to the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project or waiver, nondesignated public hospitals shall be eligible to receive safety net care pool payments for uncompensated care costs. This bill would require nondesignated public hospitals to report and certify specified information for the 2012–13 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter. Existing law authorizes a transferring entity, as defined, to make an intergovernmental transfer (IGT) to the state, and authorizes the department to accept all IGTs from a transferring entity for the purpose of providing support for the nonfederal share of risk-based payments to managed care health plans to enable those plans to compensate providers designated by the transferring entity for Medi-Cal health care services and support of the Medi-Cal program. Existing law, with some exceptions, authorizes the state to assess a fee of 20% on each IGT to reimburse the department for the administrative costs of operating the IGT program and for the support of the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that the 20% assessment shall not apply to nondesignated public hospitals. The bill would also require the department to pay rate range increases, as defined, to Medi-Cal managed care plans that contract with the department to provide Medi-Cal services in specified counties for the purpose of providing additional payments to nondesignated public hospitals for purposes of equaling the amount of reimbursement the nondesignated public hospital would have received through certified public expenditures under the fee-for-service payment methodology.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/04/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 04, 2014
- Amended 06/16/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 16, 2014
- Amended 01/06/14 - Amended Assembly pdf January 06, 2014
- Amended 05/01/13 - Amended Assembly pdf May 01, 2013
- Amended 04/08/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 08, 2013
- Introduced 02/19/13 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2013
- AB468 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3726.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (January 23).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 6). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: With amendments, but without recommendation, and be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 29).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and INS. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Dahle · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Chávez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Chávez
Co-sponsors (2)
- Dahle
- Chesbro
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 468 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to seek a successor demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that beginning with services provided on or after July 1, 2013, to the extent that additional federal funding is made available pursuant to the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project or waiver, nondesignated public hospitals shall be eligible to receive safety net care pool payments for uncompensated care costs. This bill would require nondesignated public hospitals to report and certify specified information for the 2012–13 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter. Existing law authorizes a transferring entity, as defined, to make an intergovernmental transfer (IGT) to the state, and authorizes the department to accept all IGTs from a transferring entity for the purpose of providing support for the nonfederal share of risk-based payments to managed care health plans to enable those plans to compensate providers designated by the transferring entity for Medi-Cal health care services and support of the Medi-Cal program. Existing law, with some exceptions, authorizes the state to assess a fee of 20% on each IGT to reimburse the department for the administrative costs of operating the IGT program and for the support of the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that the 20% assessment shall not apply to nondesignated public hospitals. The bill would also require the department to pay rate range increases, as defined, to Medi-Cal managed care plans that contract with the department to provide Medi-Cal services in specified counties for the purpose of providing additional payments to nondesignated public hospitals for purposes of equaling the amount of reimbursement the nondesignated public hospital would have received through certified public expenditures under the fee-for-service payment methodology.
- Who sponsors AB 468?
- AB 468 is sponsored by Dahle, Chesbro, and Chávez.
- What is the current status of AB 468?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 468?
- Track AB 468 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 468
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 468
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →