California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 87 — Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013.

Last action — Died on inactive file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (authority) to make loans from the continuously appropriated California Health Facilities Financing Authority Fund to participating health institutions for financing or refinancing the acquisition, construction, or remodeling of health facilities. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the continuously appropriated Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act, as originally enacted, limited state administrative costs to implement duties pursuant to the programs to 5% of the total of annual revenues received for the fund. Existing law limits state administrative costs to 3.5%. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (commission) to oversee the administration of various parts of the Mental Health Services Act. The act provides that it may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of each house as long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act, and that the Legislature may also clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would restore the limit on state administrative costs to 5%. This bill would establish the Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the authority for the purposes of the act be made available to selected counties or counties acting jointly, except as otherwise provided, and used to increase capacity for client assistance and services in crisis intervention, crisis stabilization, crisis residential treatment, rehabilitative mental health services, and mobile crisis support teams. The bill would require the authority to develop and to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, as prescribed. The bill would require the authority to provide prescribed reports to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature on May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the commission for the purposes of the act be allocated to selected counties, counties acting jointly, or city mental health departments, as determined by the commission through a selection process, for triage personnel to provide intensive case management and linkage to services for individuals with mental health disorders. The bill would authorize triage personnel to provide targeted case management services face to face, by telephone, or by telehealth. The bill would require the commission to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, and require the commission to provide a prescribed report to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2014. The bill would prohibit funds awarded by the authority or commission from being used to supplant existing financial and resource commitments of the grantee. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the California Health Facilities Financing Authority for these purposes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on inactive file.

  2. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Leno.

  3. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1363.)

  4. Ordered to third reading.

  5. (Ayes 23. Noes 9. Page 1337.)

  6. Withdrawn from committee.

  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  8. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1396.)

  11. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1314.)

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1313.)

  14. Ordered to second reading.

  15. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 1312.)

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 87 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 51 Yea · 24 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452003
Republican 0400
Democratic 6001
Total 512404
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Daly — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Torres — Yea
Pan — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Williams — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Ammiano — Not Voting
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Holden — Not Voting
Maienschein — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 87 do?
The California Health Facilities Financing Authority Act authorizes the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (authority) to make loans from the continuously appropriated California Health Facilities Financing Authority Fund to participating health institutions for financing or refinancing the acquisition, construction, or remodeling of health facilities. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the continuously appropriated Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act, as originally enacted, limited state administrative costs to implement duties pursuant to the programs to 5% of the total of annual revenues received for the fund. Existing law limits state administrative costs to 3.5%. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (commission) to oversee the administration of various parts of the Mental Health Services Act. The act provides that it may be amended by the Legislature by a 23 vote of each house as long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act, and that the Legislature may also clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. This bill would restore the limit on state administrative costs to 5%. This bill would establish the Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the authority for the purposes of the act be made available to selected counties or counties acting jointly, except as otherwise provided, and used to increase capacity for client assistance and services in crisis intervention, crisis stabilization, crisis residential treatment, rehabilitative mental health services, and mobile crisis support teams. The bill would require the authority to develop and to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, as prescribed. The bill would require the authority to provide prescribed reports to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature on May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the Legislature to the commission for the purposes of the act be allocated to selected counties, counties acting jointly, or city mental health departments, as determined by the commission through a selection process, for triage personnel to provide intensive case management and linkage to services for individuals with mental health disorders. The bill would authorize triage personnel to provide targeted case management services face to face, by telephone, or by telehealth. The bill would require the commission to consider specified selection criteria for awarding grants, and require the commission to provide a prescribed report to the fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature by March 1, 2014. The bill would prohibit funds awarded by the authority or commission from being used to supplant existing financial and resource commitments of the grantee. The bill would appropriate $500,000 from the General Fund to the California Health Facilities Financing Authority for these purposes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 87?
AB 87 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 87?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 87?
Track AB 87 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 87

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 87

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →