California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 304 — Pesticides: toxic air contaminant: control measures.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 584, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the Director of Pesticide Regulation, upon completion of an evaluation of a pesticide, to prepare a report on the health effects of any pesticide determined to be a toxic air contaminant that poses a present or potential hazard to human health due to airborne emission from its use, as specified. Existing law requires this report to be made available to the public, as specified. Existing law also requires the director to determine, in consultation with specified agencies, the need for and appropriate degree of control measures for each pesticide listed as a toxic air contaminant. Existing law defines toxic air contaminant to include those pesticides that have been identified as hazardous air pollutants pursuant to federal law. This bill would require the director's written determination regarding control measures for each pesticide and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies be made available to the public. The bill, for each pesticide for which a risk assessment has been completed that has been identified by the director as a toxic air contaminant based on its listing as a federally identified hazardous air pollutant, would require the director, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the State Air Resources Board, and the air pollution control or air quality management districts in the affected counties, to determine the need for and appropriate degree of control measures, as specified. The bill would require the director's written determination and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies in regard to control measures for these pesticides to be made available to the public. (2) Existing law requires, for those pesticides for which a need for control measures has been determined, the director, in consultation with specified agencies, to develop control measures designed to reduce emissions sufficiently so the source will not expose the public to the levels of exposure that may cause or contribute to significant adverse health effects. Existing law requires, after a public hearing, the director to adopt, by regulation, control measures, including application of the best practicable control techniques for those pesticides for which a need has been determined. This bill would require the director to follow specified consultation procedures and would require the director, within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, as specified, to adopt control measures to protect human health. The bill, if the director is unable to adopt control measures to protect human health within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, would require the director to submit a specified report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature setting forth the reasons that requirement has not been met and to update that report, as specified. The bill would require, with respect to any pesticide for which a determination of the need for control measures was made before January 1, 2014, that the 2-year period described above commence on January 1, 2014. (3) This bill also would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 584, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3075.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3064.)

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2246.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  11. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Referred to Com. on E.Q.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1788.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.

  23. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  24. Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Williams · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Williams

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 2001
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 67001
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Stone — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Daly — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Gray — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Logue — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Medina — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 304 do?
(1) Existing law requires the Director of Pesticide Regulation, upon completion of an evaluation of a pesticide, to prepare a report on the health effects of any pesticide determined to be a toxic air contaminant that poses a present or potential hazard to human health due to airborne emission from its use, as specified. Existing law requires this report to be made available to the public, as specified. Existing law also requires the director to determine, in consultation with specified agencies, the need for and appropriate degree of control measures for each pesticide listed as a toxic air contaminant. Existing law defines toxic air contaminant to include those pesticides that have been identified as hazardous air pollutants pursuant to federal law. This bill would require the director's written determination regarding control measures for each pesticide and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies be made available to the public. The bill, for each pesticide for which a risk assessment has been completed that has been identified by the director as a toxic air contaminant based on its listing as a federally identified hazardous air pollutant, would require the director, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the State Air Resources Board, and the air pollution control or air quality management districts in the affected counties, to determine the need for and appropriate degree of control measures, as specified. The bill would require the director's written determination and any formal written comments made by consulting agencies in regard to control measures for these pesticides to be made available to the public. (2) Existing law requires, for those pesticides for which a need for control measures has been determined, the director, in consultation with specified agencies, to develop control measures designed to reduce emissions sufficiently so the source will not expose the public to the levels of exposure that may cause or contribute to significant adverse health effects. Existing law requires, after a public hearing, the director to adopt, by regulation, control measures, including application of the best practicable control techniques for those pesticides for which a need has been determined. This bill would require the director to follow specified consultation procedures and would require the director, within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, as specified, to adopt control measures to protect human health. The bill, if the director is unable to adopt control measures to protect human health within 2 years of the determination of the need for control measures, would require the director to submit a specified report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature setting forth the reasons that requirement has not been met and to update that report, as specified. The bill would require, with respect to any pesticide for which a determination of the need for control measures was made before January 1, 2014, that the 2-year period described above commence on January 1, 2014. (3) This bill also would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Who sponsors AB 304?
AB 304 is sponsored by Williams.
What is the current status of AB 304?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 304?
Track AB 304 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 304

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 304

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →