California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 468 — Developmental services: statewide Self-Determination Program.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 683, Statutes of 2013.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Under existing law, the regional centers purchase needed services and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers, or arrange for their provision through other publicly funded agencies. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Existing law establishes, contingent upon approval of a federal waiver, the Self-Directed Services Program, and requires the program to be available in every regional center catchment area to provide participants, within an individual budget, greater control over needed services and supports. This bill would require the department, contingent upon approval of federal funding, to establish and implement a state Self-Determination Program, as defined, that would be available in every regional center catchment area to provide participants and their families, within an individual budget, increased flexibility and choice, and greater control over decisions, resources, and needed and desired services and supports to implement their IPP, in accordance with prescribed requirements. The statewide program would be phased in over 3 years, serving up to 2,500 regional center consumers during the phase-in period, and thereafter, available on a voluntary basis to all eligible regional center consumers. The bill would require the department to, among other things, apply for federal funding for the program by December 31, 2014. This bill would provide that program participants receive an individual budget, as prescribed, to be used for the purchase of services and supports necessary to implement the participant's IPP. The bill would require program participants to agree to, among other things, manage self-determination services and supports within the individual budget. The bill would require the department to require nonvendored providers of services and supports who meet specified criteria to submit to a criminal background check, as specified. The bill would require the department, with respect to this background check, to submit fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice, and would require the Department of Justice to provide specified responses to the department. The bill would require the Department of Justice to charge a fee sufficient to cover the cost of processing this request. The bill would, among other things, require each regional center to be responsible for implementing the program as a term of its contract, and to establish a local voluntary advisory committee to provide oversight of the project. The bill would require the State Council on Developmental Disabilities to form a volunteer statewide committee to, among other things, identify self-determination best practices. The bill would require the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, in collaboration with specified entities, to issue to the Legislature a report regarding the status of the program and recommendations to the program, as specified, and would require the department, beginning January 10, 2017, to provide to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature prescribed information relating to the program.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 683, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2380.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3171.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Page 2946.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 30).

  11. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  15. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1203.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1014.) (May 23).

  21. Set for hearing May 23.

  22. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  23. Set for hearing May 13.

  24. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Set for hearing May 6.

  26. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 661.) (April 23).

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  29. Set for hearing April 23.

  30. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  31. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  32. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Mitchell · Cosponsor
  • Beall · Cosponsor
  • Chesbro · Cosponsor
  • Emmerson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Emmerson

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Mitchell
  • Beall
  • Chesbro

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Supp 1 SB468 Emmerson Concurrence

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Liu — Yea
Beall — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Wright — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Walters — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 468 Emmerson Senate Third Reading By MITCHELL

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Allen — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Chau — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fox — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent #8

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 3000
Total 38001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 468 do?
Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Under existing law, the regional centers purchase needed services and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers, or arrange for their provision through other publicly funded agencies. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Existing law establishes, contingent upon approval of a federal waiver, the Self-Directed Services Program, and requires the program to be available in every regional center catchment area to provide participants, within an individual budget, greater control over needed services and supports. This bill would require the department, contingent upon approval of federal funding, to establish and implement a state Self-Determination Program, as defined, that would be available in every regional center catchment area to provide participants and their families, within an individual budget, increased flexibility and choice, and greater control over decisions, resources, and needed and desired services and supports to implement their IPP, in accordance with prescribed requirements. The statewide program would be phased in over 3 years, serving up to 2,500 regional center consumers during the phase-in period, and thereafter, available on a voluntary basis to all eligible regional center consumers. The bill would require the department to, among other things, apply for federal funding for the program by December 31, 2014. This bill would provide that program participants receive an individual budget, as prescribed, to be used for the purchase of services and supports necessary to implement the participant's IPP. The bill would require program participants to agree to, among other things, manage self-determination services and supports within the individual budget. The bill would require the department to require nonvendored providers of services and supports who meet specified criteria to submit to a criminal background check, as specified. The bill would require the department, with respect to this background check, to submit fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice, and would require the Department of Justice to provide specified responses to the department. The bill would require the Department of Justice to charge a fee sufficient to cover the cost of processing this request. The bill would, among other things, require each regional center to be responsible for implementing the program as a term of its contract, and to establish a local voluntary advisory committee to provide oversight of the project. The bill would require the State Council on Developmental Disabilities to form a volunteer statewide committee to, among other things, identify self-determination best practices. The bill would require the State Council on Developmental Disabilities, in collaboration with specified entities, to issue to the Legislature a report regarding the status of the program and recommendations to the program, as specified, and would require the department, beginning January 10, 2017, to provide to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature prescribed information relating to the program.
Who sponsors SB 468?
SB 468 is sponsored by Mitchell, Beall, Chesbro, and Emmerson.
What is the current status of SB 468?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 468?
Track SB 468 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 468

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 468

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →