Workers' compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2732 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2732.
You're tracking AB 2732
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2732 — Workers' compensation.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 217, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law generally provides for the reimbursement of medical providers for services rendered in connection with the treatment of a worker's injury, and requires an employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements. Existing law provides for an independent medical review process to resolve disputes over a utilization review decision for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and for any decision that is communicated to the requesting physician on or after July 1, 2013, regardless of the date of injury. Under existing law, as part of its notification to the employee regarding an initial utilization review decision that denies, modifies, or delays a treatment recommendation, an employer is required to provide the employee with a one-page form prescribed by the administrative director, and an addressed envelope, which the employee may return to the administrative director or the administrative director's designee to initiate an independent medical review. Under existing law, an employer is required to include on this form any information required by the administrative director to facilitate the completion of the independent medical review. Existing law specifies the required contents of the form. This bill would revise the requirements applicable to utilization review procedures by changing the maximum length of the above-described form to 2 pages. (2) Existing law authorizes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board to determine and allow as liens against any sum to be paid as compensation, certain amounts, including, but not limited to, reasonable medical treatment expenses, except those disputes subject to independent medical review or independent bill review. This bill would include in those amounts that the board is authorized to allow as liens certain medical-legal expenses to which the employee is entitled under a specified provision for the purpose of proving or disproving a disputed claim. (3) Existing law requires that a lien claimant in a workers' compensation matter is entitled to an order or award for reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee, together with interest at the rate allowed on civil judgments, if certain conditions are satisfied. This bill would specify that these fees are to be paid by the employer of the injured worker. (4) Existing law requires an order or award for payment of a lien for medical or hospital treatment in a workers' compensation matter to be made for payment only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses for medical or hospital treatment at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee unless the person has ceased doing business in the capacity held at the time the expenses were incurred and has assigned all right, title, and interest in the remaining accounts receivable to the assignee. This bill would authorize an assignment of that payment if the assignment was completed prior to January 1, 2013, or if it was required by a contract that became enforceable and irrevocable prior to January 1, 2013. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. (5) Existing law authorizes an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation, including vocational rehabilitation services, within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability or that providing vocational rehabilitation services has become feasible because the employee's medical condition has improved or because of other factors not capable of determination at the time the employer's liability for vocational rehabilitation services otherwise terminated. This bill would delete the provisions relating to vocational rehabilitation, but retain the authority of an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/19/14 - Chaptered Current pdf August 19, 2014
- Enrolled 08/06/14 - Enrolled pdf August 06, 2014
- Amended 06/15/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 15, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/25/14 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2014
- AB2732 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 217, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5843.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 1 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4257.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4851.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 2).
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Insurance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Insurance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2732 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law generally provides for the reimbursement of medical providers for services rendered in connection with the treatment of a worker's injury, and requires an employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements. Existing law provides for an independent medical review process to resolve disputes over a utilization review decision for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and for any decision that is communicated to the requesting physician on or after July 1, 2013, regardless of the date of injury. Under existing law, as part of its notification to the employee regarding an initial utilization review decision that denies, modifies, or delays a treatment recommendation, an employer is required to provide the employee with a one-page form prescribed by the administrative director, and an addressed envelope, which the employee may return to the administrative director or the administrative director's designee to initiate an independent medical review. Under existing law, an employer is required to include on this form any information required by the administrative director to facilitate the completion of the independent medical review. Existing law specifies the required contents of the form. This bill would revise the requirements applicable to utilization review procedures by changing the maximum length of the above-described form to 2 pages. (2) Existing law authorizes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board to determine and allow as liens against any sum to be paid as compensation, certain amounts, including, but not limited to, reasonable medical treatment expenses, except those disputes subject to independent medical review or independent bill review. This bill would include in those amounts that the board is authorized to allow as liens certain medical-legal expenses to which the employee is entitled under a specified provision for the purpose of proving or disproving a disputed claim. (3) Existing law requires that a lien claimant in a workers' compensation matter is entitled to an order or award for reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee, together with interest at the rate allowed on civil judgments, if certain conditions are satisfied. This bill would specify that these fees are to be paid by the employer of the injured worker. (4) Existing law requires an order or award for payment of a lien for medical or hospital treatment in a workers' compensation matter to be made for payment only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses for medical or hospital treatment at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee unless the person has ceased doing business in the capacity held at the time the expenses were incurred and has assigned all right, title, and interest in the remaining accounts receivable to the assignee. This bill would authorize an assignment of that payment if the assignment was completed prior to January 1, 2013, or if it was required by a contract that became enforceable and irrevocable prior to January 1, 2013. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. (5) Existing law authorizes an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation, including vocational rehabilitation services, within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability or that providing vocational rehabilitation services has become feasible because the employee's medical condition has improved or because of other factors not capable of determination at the time the employer's liability for vocational rehabilitation services otherwise terminated. This bill would delete the provisions relating to vocational rehabilitation, but retain the authority of an injured worker to institute proceedings for the collection of compensation within 5 years after the date of the injury upon the ground that the original injury has caused new and further disability.
- Who sponsors AB 2732?
- AB 2732 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
- What is the current status of AB 2732?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2732?
- Track AB 2732 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2732
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2732
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →