California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 680 — Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement: qualified escrow funds.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 168, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Under existing law, states' attorneys general and various tobacco product manufacturers have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) , in settlement of various lawsuits, that provides for the allocation of money to the states and certain territories. Existing law requires a tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer, as defined, and generally perform its financial obligations under the MSA, or to place specified amounts into a qualified escrow fund, which are calculated on a per unit sold basis, as specified. For each tobacco product manufacturer that places amounts into a qualified escrow fund, existing law requires that manufacturer to certify to the Attorney General that the manufacturer has complied with existing law, and the failure to place all required funds into escrow subjects the manufacturer to civil penalties, as specified. This bill would, for the purposes of calculating the amount a tobacco product manufacturer is required to place in the qualified escrow fund, revise the definition of "units sold" to specify that it means the number of cigarettes sold to a consumer, regardless of whether the state excise tax was due or collected, but would exclude, among other things, cigarettes sold at federal military installations.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 168, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:45 a.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 2387.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 25).

  8. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  9. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 972.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  11. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  12. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 852.) (May 7).

  14. Set for hearing May 7.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. Read first time.

  19. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.

  20. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 72 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 62005
Democratic 6001
Republican 4000
Total 72006
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Not Voting
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Daly — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Stone — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Levine — Yea
Logue — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8000
Democratic 2000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Alejo — Yea
Chau — Yea
Stone — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent #5

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Democratic 3000
Total 36003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Price — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Democratic 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 680 do?
Under existing law, states' attorneys general and various tobacco product manufacturers have entered into a Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) , in settlement of various lawsuits, that provides for the allocation of money to the states and certain territories. Existing law requires a tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the state to either become a participating manufacturer, as defined, and generally perform its financial obligations under the MSA, or to place specified amounts into a qualified escrow fund, which are calculated on a per unit sold basis, as specified. For each tobacco product manufacturer that places amounts into a qualified escrow fund, existing law requires that manufacturer to certify to the Attorney General that the manufacturer has complied with existing law, and the failure to place all required funds into escrow subjects the manufacturer to civil penalties, as specified. This bill would, for the purposes of calculating the amount a tobacco product manufacturer is required to place in the qualified escrow fund, revise the definition of "units sold" to specify that it means the number of cigarettes sold to a consumer, regardless of whether the state excise tax was due or collected, but would exclude, among other things, cigarettes sold at federal military installations.
Who sponsors SB 680?
SB 680 is sponsored by Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 680?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 680?
Track SB 680 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 680

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 680

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →