California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1074 — Horse racing: thoroughbred racing.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 428, Statutes of 2013.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Horse Racing Law, authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to make allocations of racing weeks, as it deems appropriate, and, for thoroughbred racing, establishes a maximum of 44 weeks per year of racing weeks in the northern zone, a maximum of 42 weeks per year in the central zone, and a maximum of 7 weeks per year in the southern zone. Existing law also prohibits the board from allocating dates to a thoroughbred association in the central zone for conducting racing during daytime hours, if in the southern zone, a thoroughbred racing association is conducting racing on the same date during daytime hours. A violation of the Horse Racing Law is a crime. This bill would, instead of separate allocations to the central and southern zones, establish a maximum of 49 racing weeks per year in the combined central and southern zones. The bill would also require the board to allocate from those weeks a minimum number of weeks to certain racetracks in the central and southern zones that were used to conduct thoroughbred race meetings prior to 2012 and would authorize the board to allocate from those weeks a maximum number of weeks to certain racetracks in the southern zone that were not used to conduct thoroughbred race meetings in the southern zone prior to 2012. The bill would prohibit the board from allocating dates to a thoroughbred association in the southern zone for the purpose of conducting racing, regardless of the hours, if, on the same date and during daytime hours, a thoroughbred racing association is conducting racing in the central zone, and would reciprocally prohibit the allocation of racing dates to a thoroughbred association in the central zone when daytime racing is conducted by a thoroughbred association in the southern zone. Because a violation of those provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that, except as specified, if a venue licensed to conduct thoroughbred racing in the central zone in 2008 is not available for racing in 2009 or thereafter, the dates formerly allocated to that venue shall be available for allocation by the board, and further provides that, if a racetrack located in the central zone is not available for use by a thoroughbred association that was licensed to conduct a live race meet at that racetrack in 2009, the board is authorized to allocate racing dates to that association to be operated at a racetrack in the central zone or southern zone for racing in 2010 or thereafter. This bill would repeal those provisions. Existing law, operative until January 1, 2014, authorizes thoroughbred racing associations, fairs, and the organization responsible for contracting with thoroughbred racing associations and fairs with respect to the conduct of racing meetings, to form a private, statewide marketing organization to market and promote thoroughbred and fair horse racing. If a marketing organization is formed, existing law requires an amount not to exceed 0.25% of the total amount handled by each satellite wagering facility to be distributed to the marketing organization, and imposes certain requirements on the marketing organization, including that the marketing organization annually submit certain information to the board. Violations of the Horse Racing Law are generally misdemeanors. This bill would extend the operation of those provisions to January 1, 2015. By extending those provisions of the Horse Racing Law, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would create new crimes and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make conforming changes to specified provisions in order to update cross-references. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 428, Statutes of 2013.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2927.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2107.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  15. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1760.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 24).

  21. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  24. Read first time.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.

  26. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Atkins · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Atkins

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 3000
Total 78000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Conway — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Logue — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gray — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Garcia — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fox — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 2001
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lara — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Knight — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 66002
Democratic 7000
Republican 4000
Total 77002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Daly — Yea
Stone — Yea
Campos — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Medina — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Pan — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Atkins — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Linder — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15001
Republican 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gray — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Levine — Yea
Perea — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1074 do?
Existing law, the Horse Racing Law, authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to make allocations of racing weeks, as it deems appropriate, and, for thoroughbred racing, establishes a maximum of 44 weeks per year of racing weeks in the northern zone, a maximum of 42 weeks per year in the central zone, and a maximum of 7 weeks per year in the southern zone. Existing law also prohibits the board from allocating dates to a thoroughbred association in the central zone for conducting racing during daytime hours, if in the southern zone, a thoroughbred racing association is conducting racing on the same date during daytime hours. A violation of the Horse Racing Law is a crime. This bill would, instead of separate allocations to the central and southern zones, establish a maximum of 49 racing weeks per year in the combined central and southern zones. The bill would also require the board to allocate from those weeks a minimum number of weeks to certain racetracks in the central and southern zones that were used to conduct thoroughbred race meetings prior to 2012 and would authorize the board to allocate from those weeks a maximum number of weeks to certain racetracks in the southern zone that were not used to conduct thoroughbred race meetings in the southern zone prior to 2012. The bill would prohibit the board from allocating dates to a thoroughbred association in the southern zone for the purpose of conducting racing, regardless of the hours, if, on the same date and during daytime hours, a thoroughbred racing association is conducting racing in the central zone, and would reciprocally prohibit the allocation of racing dates to a thoroughbred association in the central zone when daytime racing is conducted by a thoroughbred association in the southern zone. Because a violation of those provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that, except as specified, if a venue licensed to conduct thoroughbred racing in the central zone in 2008 is not available for racing in 2009 or thereafter, the dates formerly allocated to that venue shall be available for allocation by the board, and further provides that, if a racetrack located in the central zone is not available for use by a thoroughbred association that was licensed to conduct a live race meet at that racetrack in 2009, the board is authorized to allocate racing dates to that association to be operated at a racetrack in the central zone or southern zone for racing in 2010 or thereafter. This bill would repeal those provisions. Existing law, operative until January 1, 2014, authorizes thoroughbred racing associations, fairs, and the organization responsible for contracting with thoroughbred racing associations and fairs with respect to the conduct of racing meetings, to form a private, statewide marketing organization to market and promote thoroughbred and fair horse racing. If a marketing organization is formed, existing law requires an amount not to exceed 0.25% of the total amount handled by each satellite wagering facility to be distributed to the marketing organization, and imposes certain requirements on the marketing organization, including that the marketing organization annually submit certain information to the board. Violations of the Horse Racing Law are generally misdemeanors. This bill would extend the operation of those provisions to January 1, 2015. By extending those provisions of the Horse Racing Law, a violation of which is a crime, the bill would create new crimes and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make conforming changes to specified provisions in order to update cross-references. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1074?
AB 1074 is sponsored by Atkins.
What is the current status of AB 1074?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1074?
Track AB 1074 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1074

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1074

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →