AB 2222 — Housing density bonus.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 682, Statutes of 2014.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law requires, when a developer of housing proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of the local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents. Existing law requires continued affordability for 30 years or longer, as specified, of all very low and low-income units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus. This bill instead would require continued affordability for 55 years or longer, as specified, of all very low and low-income rental units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus. This bill would also include very low and low-income persons among the initial occupants of for-sale units. This bill also would prohibit an applicant from receiving a density bonus unless the proposed housing development would, for units subject to certain affordability requirements that were occupied by qualifying persons on the date of application, provide at least the same number of units of equivalent size or type, or both, to be made available for rent at affordable housing costs to, and occupied by, persons and families in the same or lower income category as those households in occupancy. For those subject types of units that have been vacated or demolished at the time of application, this bill would condition a density bonus upon at least the same number of units of equivalent size or type, or both, as existed at the highpoint in the preceding 5 years being made available at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and families in the same or lower income category as those persons and families in occupancy at that time, if known. Existing law also requires a city, county, or city and county to grant a density bonus or other incentives, as specified, when an applicant for approval to convert apartments to a condominium project agrees, among other things, to provide a specified percentage of units for low- or moderate-income persons and families or for lower income households, as defined. This bill also would prohibit an applicant from receiving a density bonus unless the proposed condominium project would replace the existing affordable units with at least the same number of affordable units of equivalent size or type, or both, and the proposed development, inclusive of the units replaced pursuant to the requirements described above, contains affordable units according to specified percentages or consists entirely of affordable units.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/14 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2014
- Enrolled 08/29/14 - Enrolled pdf August 29, 2014
- Amended 08/22/14 - Amended Senate pdf August 22, 2014
- Amended 06/26/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2014
- Amended 06/17/14 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2014
- Amended 05/05/14 - Amended Assembly pdf May 05, 2014
- Amended 04/22/14 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2014
- Amended 03/28/14 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2014
- Introduced 02/20/14 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2014
- AB2222 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 682, Statutes of 2014.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6570.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6550.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4864.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 24).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5097.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 7).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
(pending re-referral to the Com. on L. GOV.)
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4737.)
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4737.)
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 30).
-
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Nazarian · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nazarian
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2222 do?
- The Planning and Zoning Law requires, when a developer of housing proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of the local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents. Existing law requires continued affordability for 30 years or longer, as specified, of all very low and low-income units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus. This bill instead would require continued affordability for 55 years or longer, as specified, of all very low and low-income rental units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus. This bill would also include very low and low-income persons among the initial occupants of for-sale units. This bill also would prohibit an applicant from receiving a density bonus unless the proposed housing development would, for units subject to certain affordability requirements that were occupied by qualifying persons on the date of application, provide at least the same number of units of equivalent size or type, or both, to be made available for rent at affordable housing costs to, and occupied by, persons and families in the same or lower income category as those households in occupancy. For those subject types of units that have been vacated or demolished at the time of application, this bill would condition a density bonus upon at least the same number of units of equivalent size or type, or both, as existed at the highpoint in the preceding 5 years being made available at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and families in the same or lower income category as those persons and families in occupancy at that time, if known. Existing law also requires a city, county, or city and county to grant a density bonus or other incentives, as specified, when an applicant for approval to convert apartments to a condominium project agrees, among other things, to provide a specified percentage of units for low- or moderate-income persons and families or for lower income households, as defined. This bill also would prohibit an applicant from receiving a density bonus unless the proposed condominium project would replace the existing affordable units with at least the same number of affordable units of equivalent size or type, or both, and the proposed development, inclusive of the units replaced pursuant to the requirements described above, contains affordable units according to specified percentages or consists entirely of affordable units.
- Who sponsors AB 2222?
- AB 2222 is sponsored by Nazarian.
- What is the current status of AB 2222?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 20, 2014. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2222?
- Track AB 2222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →