California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 64 — State parks: closure: operating agreements.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with an agency of the United States, a city, county, district, or other public agency, or any combination thereof, for the care, maintenance, administration, and control of lands of the state park system. This bill would make a statement of legislative findings and declarations, including the intent of the Legislature to encourage the department to actively seek to negotiate operating agreements with local governments, who have the interest and capacity to assist the state in operating a state park, to minimize the number of state parks that could otherwise be subject to closure due to the budget challenges facing the state.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.

  4. Ordered to third reading.

  5. Reconsideration granted. (Page 1630.)

  6. Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Hagman.

  7. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 32. Noes 19. Page 1176.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Withdrawn from committee.

  11. Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Read second time and amended.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 6.) (April 5).

  16. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  17. Read first time.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee January 9.

  19. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cook · Cosponsor
  • Dutton · Cosponsor
  • Jeffries · Primary
  • Miller · Cosponsor
  • Nestande · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Jeffries

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Cook
  • Dutton
  • Miller
  • Nestande

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 64 JEFFRIES Assembly Third Reading

Failed 32 Yea · 19 Nay · 28 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3019025
Republican 2000
Democratic 0003
Total 3219028
% of votes cast 41%24%0%35%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Nay
Garrick — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Carter — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Logue — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
Eng — Not Voting
Feuer — Nay
Campos — Nay
Mitchell — Nay
Furutani — Nay
Bonilla — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Gordon — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Hayashi — Nay
John A. Pérez — Not Voting
Hill — Nay
Hueso — Nay
Atkins — Not Voting
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Nay
Chesbro — Nay
Ammiano — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Ma — Nay
Mendoza — Not Voting
Monning — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Perea — Not Voting
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Not Voting
Swanson — Nay
Torres — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Nay
Williams — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Nay
Bradford — Not Voting
Brownley — Nay
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Not Voting
Mansoor — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Wagner — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Not Voting
Fuentes — Not Voting
Gatto — Not Voting
Yamada — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 7 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5600
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 7600
% of votes cast 54%46%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hueso — Nay
Lara — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Blumenfield — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Yamada — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Roger Hernández — Nay
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 64 do?
Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with an agency of the United States, a city, county, district, or other public agency, or any combination thereof, for the care, maintenance, administration, and control of lands of the state park system. This bill would make a statement of legislative findings and declarations, including the intent of the Legislature to encourage the department to actively seek to negotiate operating agreements with local governments, who have the interest and capacity to assist the state in operating a state park, to minimize the number of state parks that could otherwise be subject to closure due to the budget challenges facing the state.
Who sponsors AB 64?
AB 64 is sponsored by Cook, Dutton, Jeffries, Miller, and Nestande.
What is the current status of AB 64?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 64?
Track AB 64 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 64

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 64

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →