California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2000 — Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires various state agencies to administer programs relating to water supply, water quality, and flood management in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The Johnston-Baker-Andal-Boatwright Delta Protection Act of 1992 (Delta Protection Act) creates the Delta Protection Commission and requires the commission to prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-term resource management plan for specified lands within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) . Existing law, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009, established the Delta Stewardship Council as an independent agency of the state and required the council to consist of 7 members appointed in a specified manner. This bill would reduce the Governor's appointments to the council to 2 members, and instead provide that the Vice-Chairperson of the commission and a member of the commission chosen by a majority vote of the commission will serve on the council, as prescribed. Existing law imposes requirements on the Department of Water Resources in connection with the preparation of a Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) . The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 requires the council to consider the BDCP for inclusion in a specified Delta Plan, and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements, including a requirement that the BDCP include a comprehensive review and analysis of a range of Delta conveyance alternatives, including through-Delta, dual conveyance, and isolated conveyance alternatives and capacity and design options of specified canals and pipelines. This bill would require the department to withdraw from a specified Memorandum of Agreement. This bill would permit the department to enter into a new agreement to further efforts to develop a BDCP only if that memorandum of agreement includes prescribed requirements. Under existing law, various general obligation bond acts have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water projects, facilities, and programs. Existing law, the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, a bond act approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,090,000,000 for the purposes of financing disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects, of which $3,000,000,000 is available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the department, for specified purposes including, but not limited to, the evaluation, repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of levees. Existing law, the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative bond act approved by the voters as Proposition 84 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $5,388,000,000, of which $275,000,000 is made available to the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for flood control projects in the Delta designed to increase the department's ability to respond to levee breaches and to reduce the potential for levee failures. This bill, with regard to those bond funds, would appropriate available funds to the department for levee improvements, as prescribed.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W., P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W., P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  7. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  8. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  9. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Huber · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Huber

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 2 Yea · 7 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2604
Republican 0100
Total 2704
% of votes cast 15%54%0%31%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Not Voting
Fong — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Hueso — Not Voting
Williams — Nay
Blumenfield — Nay
Huffman — Nay
Lara — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Roger Hernández — Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2000 do?
Existing law requires various state agencies to administer programs relating to water supply, water quality, and flood management in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The Johnston-Baker-Andal-Boatwright Delta Protection Act of 1992 (Delta Protection Act) creates the Delta Protection Commission and requires the commission to prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-term resource management plan for specified lands within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) . Existing law, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009, established the Delta Stewardship Council as an independent agency of the state and required the council to consist of 7 members appointed in a specified manner. This bill would reduce the Governor's appointments to the council to 2 members, and instead provide that the Vice-Chairperson of the commission and a member of the commission chosen by a majority vote of the commission will serve on the council, as prescribed. Existing law imposes requirements on the Department of Water Resources in connection with the preparation of a Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) . The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 requires the council to consider the BDCP for inclusion in a specified Delta Plan, and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements, including a requirement that the BDCP include a comprehensive review and analysis of a range of Delta conveyance alternatives, including through-Delta, dual conveyance, and isolated conveyance alternatives and capacity and design options of specified canals and pipelines. This bill would require the department to withdraw from a specified Memorandum of Agreement. This bill would permit the department to enter into a new agreement to further efforts to develop a BDCP only if that memorandum of agreement includes prescribed requirements. Under existing law, various general obligation bond acts have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water projects, facilities, and programs. Existing law, the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, a bond act approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,090,000,000 for the purposes of financing disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects, of which $3,000,000,000 is available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the department, for specified purposes including, but not limited to, the evaluation, repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of levees. Existing law, the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative bond act approved by the voters as Proposition 84 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $5,388,000,000, of which $275,000,000 is made available to the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for flood control projects in the Delta designed to increase the department's ability to respond to levee breaches and to reduce the potential for levee failures. This bill, with regard to those bond funds, would appropriate available funds to the department for levee improvements, as prescribed.
Who sponsors AB 2000?
AB 2000 is sponsored by Huber.
What is the current status of AB 2000?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2000?
Track AB 2000 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2000

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2000

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →