California State University and University of California: compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1561 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1561.
You're tracking AB 1561
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1561 — California State University and University of California: compensation.
Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California State University under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the University of California under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. This bill would prohibit the trustees from entering into or renewing, and would request the regents not to enter into or renew, a contract that provides for a compensation increase, as defined, for an administrator, as defined, using state moneys or moneys from tuition or fees in a fiscal year in which the amount of General Fund moneys appropriated to the respective segment in the annual Budget Act for the current fiscal year is less than the amount of moneys appropriated to that segment in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year, or if mandatory systemwide resident tuition or fees have been increased in the same fiscal year. This bill would prohibit the trustees from increasing, and would request the regents not to increase, the compensation of an administrator by more than 10% relative to the immediately preceding compensation for that position. Subsequent to this increase, the bill would require, and request, that compensation to only be increased annually by the percentage of inflation, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/23/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 23, 2012
- Amended 04/10/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 10, 2012
- Amended 03/20/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 20, 2012
- Introduced 01/30/12 - Introduced pdf January 30, 2012
- AB1561 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 27).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Cosponsor
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Campos · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- Lara · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- V. Manuel Pérez · Cosponsor
- Roger Hernández · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (7)
- Alejo
- Ammiano
- Campos
- Correa
- Lara
- Williams
- V. Manuel Pérez
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1561 do?
- Existing law establishes the California State University under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the University of California under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. This bill would prohibit the trustees from entering into or renewing, and would request the regents not to enter into or renew, a contract that provides for a compensation increase, as defined, for an administrator, as defined, using state moneys or moneys from tuition or fees in a fiscal year in which the amount of General Fund moneys appropriated to the respective segment in the annual Budget Act for the current fiscal year is less than the amount of moneys appropriated to that segment in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year, or if mandatory systemwide resident tuition or fees have been increased in the same fiscal year. This bill would prohibit the trustees from increasing, and would request the regents not to increase, the compensation of an administrator by more than 10% relative to the immediately preceding compensation for that position. Subsequent to this increase, the bill would require, and request, that compensation to only be increased annually by the percentage of inflation, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 1561?
- AB 1561 is sponsored by Alejo, Ammiano, Campos, Correa, Lara, Williams, V. Manuel Pérez, and Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 1561?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1561?
- Track AB 1561 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1561
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1561
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →