California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

SB 153 — State boards: salaries prohibition.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the payment of specified salaries to the members of various state boards. A member of a state board may receive a per diem salary at a specified rate, except for a member whose salary is set pursuant to specified laws. This bill would prohibit members appointed to specified state boards from receiving a salary and would authorize a member of these state boards to receive a specified per diem payment.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends 1 section(s) of the California codes: Section 4024 of the Penal Code.

  • Section 4024 of the Penal Code

    The any at such time such

    amended

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 4. Noes 7. Page 738.) Reconsideration granted.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  4. Set for hearing April 26.

  5. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  6. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.

  7. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Set, first hearing. Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Failed 4 Yea · 7 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3601
Republican 1000
Democratic 0101
Total 4702
% of votes cast 31%54%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Wyland — Yea
De León — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Hernandez — Nay
Corbett — Nay
Wright — Nay
Anderson — Yea
Evans — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 153 do?
Existing law provides for the payment of specified salaries to the members of various state boards. A member of a state board may receive a per diem salary at a specified rate, except for a member whose salary is set pursuant to specified laws. This bill would prohibit members appointed to specified state boards from receiving a salary and would authorize a member of these state boards to receive a specified per diem payment.
Who sponsors SB 153?
SB 153 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 153?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 153?
Track SB 153 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 153

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 153

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →