Public works projects: local hiring policies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 356 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 356.
You're tracking AB 356
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 356 — Public works projects: local hiring policies.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes state agencies to enter into public works projects, as defined, and imposes various requirements with respect to the contracting and bidding process. This bill would prohibit any local agency, as defined, from mandating that any portion or percentage of work on a public works project be performed by local residents or persons residing within particular geographic areas if any portion of that public works project will take place outside the geographical boundaries of the local agency. The bill would also require a local agency to fund any increase in cost of a public works project that is located entirely within the geographical boundaries of the local agency where the public works project is funded with state funds and the local agency implements a local resident hiring policy, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/10/11 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2011
- AB356 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Hill.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Hill.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 11).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 0% | 0% | 44% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 356 do?
- Existing law authorizes state agencies to enter into public works projects, as defined, and imposes various requirements with respect to the contracting and bidding process. This bill would prohibit any local agency, as defined, from mandating that any portion or percentage of work on a public works project be performed by local residents or persons residing within particular geographic areas if any portion of that public works project will take place outside the geographical boundaries of the local agency. The bill would also require a local agency to fund any increase in cost of a public works project that is located entirely within the geographical boundaries of the local agency where the public works project is funded with state funds and the local agency implements a local resident hiring policy, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 356?
- AB 356 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of AB 356?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 356?
- Track AB 356 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 356
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 356
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →