SCA 5 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 4 of, and by adding Section 4.5 to, Article XIIIA thereof, by amending Section 2 of Article XIIIC thereof, and by amending Section 3 of Article XIIID thereof, relating to taxation.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would alternatively condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a parcel tax, as defined, by a school district, community college district, or county office of education upon the approval of 55% of its voters voting on the proposition, if the proposition meets specified requirements. This measure would also make conforming changes to related provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/26/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 26, 2011
- Introduced 12/06/10 - Introduced pdf December 06, 2010
- SCA5 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing June 21.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
(Corrected May 31.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Set for hearing June 7.
-
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 763.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and E. & C.A.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 6.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Cosponsor
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Calderon · Cosponsor
- De León · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Corbett · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Gordon · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Kehoe · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Liu · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Price · Cosponsor
- Simitian · Primary
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
- Vargas · Cosponsor
- Wolk · Cosponsor
- Wright · Cosponsor
- Yee · Cosponsor
- Bonnie Lowenthal · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 96 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Simitian
Co-sponsors (25)
- Alquist
- Blumenfield
- Calderon
- De León
- Chesbro
- Corbett
- DeSaulnier
- Evans
- Gordon
- Hancock
- Huffman
- Kehoe
- Leno
- Lieu
- Liu
- Pavley
- Price
- Skinner
- Steinberg
- Vargas
- Wolk
- Wright
- Yee
- Bonnie Lowenthal
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Not signed on (96)
96 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 96 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCA 5 do?
- The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would alternatively condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a parcel tax, as defined, by a school district, community college district, or county office of education upon the approval of 55% of its voters voting on the proposition, if the proposition meets specified requirements. This measure would also make conforming changes to related provisions.
- Who sponsors SCA 5?
- SCA 5 is sponsored by Alquist, Blumenfield, Calderon, De León, Chesbro, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Evans, Gordon, Hancock, Huffman, Kehoe, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Pavley, Price, Simitian, Skinner, Steinberg, Vargas, Wolk, Wright, Yee, Bonnie Lowenthal, and Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SCA 5?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 5?
- Track SCA 5 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 5
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 5
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →