California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 498 — Graffiti offenses: penalties: abatement program fine: driver's license: suspension.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides that every person who maliciously commits any act to deface, damage, or destroy any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law, is guilty of vandalism. Existing law provides that any person who knowingly commits any act of vandalism to a church, synagogue, mosque, temple, building owned and occupied by a religious educational institution, or other place primarily used as a place of worship where religious services are regularly conducted, or a cemetery is guilty of a crime. Existing law also provides that any person who willfully and maliciously injects into or throws upon, or otherwise defaces, damages, destroys, or contaminates, any structure with butyric acid, or any other similar noxious or caustic chemical or substance, is guilty of a public offense. Existing law requires a court, upon conviction of any person under those provisions for acts of vandalism consisting of defacing property with graffiti or other inscribed materials, when appropriate and feasible, in addition to any other punishment that the court may impose in the form of a fine or imprisonment, or both, to order the defendant to clean up, repair, or replace the damaged property himself or herself, or order the defendant, and his or her parents or guardians if the defendant is a minor, to keep the damaged property or another specified property in the community free of graffiti for up to one year. This bill would, in addition to the punishment imposed under the above provisions, require the court to impose a $30 graffiti abatement program fine for deposit into the Graffiti Abatement Program Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require, upon appropriation by the Legislature, that the moneys in the fund be allocated to city and county graffiti abatement programs in proportion to the number of convictions occurring in each city or county that has a graffiti abatement program. (2) Existing law requires the court, for every conviction of a person for a violation of offenses described in paragraph (1) , to suspend the person's driving privilege for not more than 2 years, except when the court finds that a personal or family hardship exists that requires the person to have a driver's license for his or her own, or a member of his or her family's, employment, school, or medically related purposes. Existing law also requires the court, if the person convicted does not yet have the privilege to drive, to order the Department of Motor Vehicles to delay issuing the privilege to drive for not less than one year nor more than 3 years subsequent to the time the person becomes legally eligible to drive. Existing law, if there is no further conviction for violating the provisions of paragraph (1) in a 12-month period after the conviction, authorizes the court, upon petition of the person affected, to modify the order imposing the delay of the privilege. This bill would delete the exceptions from these provisions and the court's discretion to modify the order imposing the delay of a person's driving privilege.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Alejo

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 498 do?
(1) Existing law provides that every person who maliciously commits any act to deface, damage, or destroy any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law, is guilty of vandalism. Existing law provides that any person who knowingly commits any act of vandalism to a church, synagogue, mosque, temple, building owned and occupied by a religious educational institution, or other place primarily used as a place of worship where religious services are regularly conducted, or a cemetery is guilty of a crime. Existing law also provides that any person who willfully and maliciously injects into or throws upon, or otherwise defaces, damages, destroys, or contaminates, any structure with butyric acid, or any other similar noxious or caustic chemical or substance, is guilty of a public offense. Existing law requires a court, upon conviction of any person under those provisions for acts of vandalism consisting of defacing property with graffiti or other inscribed materials, when appropriate and feasible, in addition to any other punishment that the court may impose in the form of a fine or imprisonment, or both, to order the defendant to clean up, repair, or replace the damaged property himself or herself, or order the defendant, and his or her parents or guardians if the defendant is a minor, to keep the damaged property or another specified property in the community free of graffiti for up to one year. This bill would, in addition to the punishment imposed under the above provisions, require the court to impose a $30 graffiti abatement program fine for deposit into the Graffiti Abatement Program Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require, upon appropriation by the Legislature, that the moneys in the fund be allocated to city and county graffiti abatement programs in proportion to the number of convictions occurring in each city or county that has a graffiti abatement program. (2) Existing law requires the court, for every conviction of a person for a violation of offenses described in paragraph (1) , to suspend the person's driving privilege for not more than 2 years, except when the court finds that a personal or family hardship exists that requires the person to have a driver's license for his or her own, or a member of his or her family's, employment, school, or medically related purposes. Existing law also requires the court, if the person convicted does not yet have the privilege to drive, to order the Department of Motor Vehicles to delay issuing the privilege to drive for not less than one year nor more than 3 years subsequent to the time the person becomes legally eligible to drive. Existing law, if there is no further conviction for violating the provisions of paragraph (1) in a 12-month period after the conviction, authorizes the court, upon petition of the person affected, to modify the order imposing the delay of the privilege. This bill would delete the exceptions from these provisions and the court's discretion to modify the order imposing the delay of a person's driving privilege.
Who sponsors AB 498?
AB 498 is sponsored by Alejo.
What is the current status of AB 498?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 498?
Track AB 498 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 498

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 498

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →