California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

SB 967 — Public postsecondary education: executive officer compensation.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents, the trustees, and the board to employ officers and other employees. This bill would prohibit the trustees from, and request the regents to refrain from, increasing the monetary compensation, as defined, of, or approving a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the university within 2 years of a fiscal year in which the mandatory systemwide fees of the university are increased from the immediately preceding fiscal year, or in which the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The bill would prohibit the trustees from, and request the regents to refrain from, providing monetary compensation to an incoming executive officer that exceeds 105% of the monetary compensation of the immediately preceding executive officer of the same classification that the incoming executive officer is replacing. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2023.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. Set, final hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3301.)

  3. Set for hearing April 25.

  4. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  5. Set for hearing April 18.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  7. Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 2994.) Reconsideration granted.

  8. Set for hearing March 21.

  9. Referred to Com. on ED.

  10. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 13.

  11. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Ammiano · Cosponsor
  • Portantino · Cosponsor
  • Correa · Cosponsor
  • Lieu · Cosponsor
  • Williams · Cosponsor
  • Yee · Primary
  • Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Yee

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (114)

114 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 114 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Failed 3 Yea · 2 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3205
Total 3205
% of votes cast 30%20%0%50%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Liu — Nay
Simitian — Nay
Vargas — Not Voting
Alquist — Not Voting
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Failed 4 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4303
Total 4303
% of votes cast 40%30%0%30%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Nay
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Simitian — Nay
Vargas — Not Voting
Alquist — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 967 do?
Existing law establishes the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents, the trustees, and the board to employ officers and other employees. This bill would prohibit the trustees from, and request the regents to refrain from, increasing the monetary compensation, as defined, of, or approving a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the university within 2 years of a fiscal year in which the mandatory systemwide fees of the university are increased from the immediately preceding fiscal year, or in which the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The bill would prohibit the trustees from, and request the regents to refrain from, providing monetary compensation to an incoming executive officer that exceeds 105% of the monetary compensation of the immediately preceding executive officer of the same classification that the incoming executive officer is replacing. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2023.
Who sponsors SB 967?
SB 967 is sponsored by Alejo, Ammiano, Portantino, Correa, Lieu, Williams, Yee, and Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 967?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 967?
Track SB 967 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 967

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 967

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →