California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 845 — Central Valley Flood Protection Plan: planning and land use.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the Central Valley Flood Protection Board with the authority to construct and maintain various flood control works. Existing law requires the Department of Water Resources, by January 1, 2012, to prepare, and transmit to the board, the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, which is a systemwide plan for the protection of specified lands protected by the facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control. The board is required to adopt the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan by July 1, 2012. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those requirements. (2) Existing law requires each city and county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley, within 24 months of the adoption of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, to amend its general plan to include specified data, policies, and implementation measures. The city or county is also required, within 36 months of the adoption of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, but not more than 12 months after the amendment of its general plan, to amend its zoning ordinance to be consistent with the general plan, as amended. After the general plan amendments and zoning ordinance amendments have become effective, the city or county, unless it makes specified findings, is prohibited from entering into a development agreement for property that is located within a flood hazard zone, is prohibited from approving specified permits that would result in specified construction located within a flood hazard zone, and is required to deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for a subdivision located within the flood hazard zone. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the specified findings that a city or county may make for those purposes.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  3. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  4. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 845 do?
(1) Existing law provides for the Central Valley Flood Protection Board with the authority to construct and maintain various flood control works. Existing law requires the Department of Water Resources, by January 1, 2012, to prepare, and transmit to the board, the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, which is a systemwide plan for the protection of specified lands protected by the facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control. The board is required to adopt the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan by July 1, 2012. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those requirements. (2) Existing law requires each city and county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley, within 24 months of the adoption of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, to amend its general plan to include specified data, policies, and implementation measures. The city or county is also required, within 36 months of the adoption of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan, but not more than 12 months after the amendment of its general plan, to amend its zoning ordinance to be consistent with the general plan, as amended. After the general plan amendments and zoning ordinance amendments have become effective, the city or county, unless it makes specified findings, is prohibited from entering into a development agreement for property that is located within a flood hazard zone, is prohibited from approving specified permits that would result in specified construction located within a flood hazard zone, and is required to deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for a subdivision located within the flood hazard zone. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the specified findings that a city or county may make for those purposes.
Who sponsors SB 845?
SB 845 is sponsored by Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 845?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 845?
Track SB 845 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 845

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 845

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →